Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Coronary Artery Calcification as a Predictor of Survival in Patients Receiving Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide for GVHD Prophylaxis

  • Christopher Graham
  • , Anmol Baranwal
  • , Bas Kietselaer
  • , Chadi Ayoub
  • , Carolyn Larsen
  • , Kimberly J. Langer
  • , Mohamed A. Kharfan-Dabaja
  • , Ernesto Ayala
  • , James Foran
  • , Hemant Murthy
  • , Vivek Roy
  • , Madiha Iqbal
  • , Jeanne Palmer
  • , Lisa Z. Sproat
  • , Saurabh Chhabra
  • , Nandita Khera
  • , Talal Hilal
  • , Urshila Durani
  • , Aasiya Matin
  • , Mehrdad Hefazi Torghabeh
  • Abhishek Mangaonkar, Mithun V. Shah, Mark R. Litzow, William J. Hogan, David Dingli, Hassan B. Alkhateeb

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is becoming the new standard of care for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT). High-dose cyclophosphamide has been associated with cardiac dysfunction through multiple mechanisms. We hypothesized that patients with evidence of coronary artery calcification (CAC) might be at a higher risk for non-relapse mortality (NRM) and inferior survival after receiving PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis. We retrospectively reviewed patients with hematologic diseases undergoing alloHCT using PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis in the Mayo Clinic Enterprise from 2018 to 2022. Patients with non-contrast CT imaging for review for CAC within 1 year (yr) of alloHCT were included in this study, with imaging analyzed by a blinded independent reviewer. Of 204 patients who received PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis, 144 (70.5%) had CT imaging available for CAC review. Seventy-three (50.7%) patients were positive for CAC (+) and 71 (49.3%) were negative for CAC (-). Compared to CAC-, CAC+ patients were older (64 vs 45 years, P < .001) and were more likely to have known coronary artery disease (CAD) before transplant (16.4% vs 1.4%, P = .004), but had a comparable HCT-CI (P=0.17). NRM was higher among patients with CAC+ compared to CAC- at 1 and 2-yr (26.5% versus 8.9%, P = .008), (28.0% versus 8.9%, P = .005), respectively. Univariate competing risk analysis showed that CAC was significantly associated with 2-yr NRM (HR 3.41, 95% CI 1.36-8.54, P = .009) and inferior post-alloHCT survival (2-yr OS rate 51.6% versus 72.3%, P = .01). Multivariate analysis (MVA) confirmed that CAC+ was associated with higher 2-yr NRM (HR 4.37, 95% CI 1.71-11.18, P = .002). While CAC+ did not impact OS in the whole cohort, among elderly patients age ≥60 and without a history of CAD, MVA confirmed that CAC+ was associated with an inferior 2-yr OS (HR 3.67, 95% CI 1.007-13.38, P = .049) and higher NRM (35.5% vs 0%, P = .006). Coronary artery calcification is readily assessable in imaging studies during pretransplant evaluation. Among patients receiving PTCy, CAC was associated with a higher NRM. CAC+ was associated with inferior OS, particularly in elderly patients without a history of coronary artery disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1115.e1-1115.e13
JournalTransplantation and Cellular Therapy
Volume32
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Allogeneic transplant
  • Coronary artery calcium
  • NRM
  • Post-transplant cyclophosphamide

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coronary Artery Calcification as a Predictor of Survival in Patients Receiving Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide for GVHD Prophylaxis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this