Corneal cross-linking versus conventional management for keratoconus: a lifetime economic model

Richard L. Lindstrom, John P. Berdahl, Eric D. Donnenfeld, Vance Thompson, David Kratochvil, Chiang Wong, Heather Falvey, Grace Lytle, Marc F. Botteman, John A. Carter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aims: To assess the cost-effectiveness of corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) versus no CXL for keratoconus in the United States (US). Methods: A discrete-event microsimulation was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of corneal cross-linking (CXL, Photrexa + KXL combination product) versus no CXL for patients with keratoconus. The lifetime model was conducted from a US payor perspective. The source for CXL efficacy and safety data was a 12-month randomized, open-label, sham-controlled, multi-center, pivotal trial comparing CXL versus no CXL. Other inputs were sourced from the literature. The primary outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained. Costs (2019 USD) and effects were discounted 3% annually. The impacts of underlying uncertainty were evaluated by scenario, univariate, and probabilistic analyses. Results: Starting at a mean baseline age of 31 years and considering a mixed population consisting of 80% slow-progressors and 20% fast-progressors, the CXL group was 25.9% less likely to undergo penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and spent 27.9 fewer years in advanced disease stages. CXL was dominant with lower total direct medical costs (-$8,677; $30,994 versus $39,671) and more QALYs (1.88; 21.80 versus 19.93) compared to no CXL. Considering the impact of reduced productivity loss in an exploratory scenario, CXL was associated with a lifetime cost-savings of $43,759 per patient. CXL was cost-effective within 2 years and cost-saving within 4.5 years. Limitations: Limitations include those that are common to similar pharmacoeconomic models that rely on disparate sources for inputs and extrapolation on short-term outcomes to a long-term analytical horizon. Conclusions: Keratoconus is a progressive and life-altering disease with substantial clinical, economic, and humanistic consequences. The economic value of cross-linking is maximized when applied earlier in the disease process and/or younger age, and extends to improved work productivity, out-of-pocket costs, and quality of life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)410-420
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Medical Economics
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Pharmerit North America, LLC. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • corneal ectasia
  • cost-effectiveness
  • cost–benefit analysis
  • Cross-linking
  • keratoconus
  • keratoplasty
  • myopia
  • quality of life
  • quality-adjusted life years
  • United States

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corneal cross-linking versus conventional management for keratoconus: a lifetime economic model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this