Abstract
Developing structure-performance relationships with the underlying goal of optimizing known zeolite catalysts involves the manipulation of their physicochemical properties. Here, we systematically assessed the impact of mesoscopic gradients in acid site concentration, which has generally received little attention in the design of zeolite catalysts for hydrocarbon upgrading. A series of core–shell MEL-type zeolites were synthesized with catalytically active ZSM-11 cores and passivated silicalite-2 shells of varying thickness. Our findings revealed that ZSM-11@silicalite-2 particles with ultrathin shells (<10 nm) have enhanced mass transport, characteristic of relatively smaller particles, compared to the corresponding ZSM-11 core. Catalytic testing using the methanol-to-hydrocarbon (MTH) reaction showed that core–shell zeolites exhibit longer lifetimes, higher total turnovers, and an unexpected promotion of the aromatic cycle in the hydrocarbon pool mechanism. Time-resolved acid titration of core and core–shell catalysts confirmed that the siliceous shell introduces a hydrophobic exterior that impacts molecular diffusion. In comparison, prepared MFI core-shells (ZSM-5@silicalite-1) showed similar enhancement in catalyst performance. Moreover, we prepared egg-shell configurations of each zeolite, silicalite-2@ZSM-11 and silicalite-1@ZSM-5, comprised of an inert core and catalytically active shell. This inverse design of the egg-shell created pseudo nanosheets with total turnovers that were markedly higher than their homogeneous counterparts. Collectively, this study demonstrated that mesoscopic gradients in acid concentration via the design of core–shell and egg-shell zeolites significantly improve catalyst performance over conventional analogues for hydrocarbon upgrading.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 664-675 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of Catalysis |
Volume | 405 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:JDR acknowledges support primarily from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Award Number DE-SC0014468. Additional support was provided by the Welch Foundation (Award E-1794). PJD received funding from the Catalysis Center for Energy Innovation, a U.S. Department of Energy ? Energy Frontier Research Center under Grant DE-SC0001004. This research used resources of the National Synchrotron Light Source II, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Brookhaven National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-SC0012704. SRB acknowledges support for Co-ACCESS from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division. Certain commercial names are mentioned in this manuscript for completeness and do not represent an endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Funding Information:
JDR acknowledges support primarily from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Award Number DE-SC0014468. Additional support was provided by the Welch Foundation (Award E-1794). PJD received funding from the Catalysis Center for Energy Innovation, a U.S. Department of Energy – Energy Frontier Research Center under Grant DE-SC0001004. This research used resources of the National Synchrotron Light Source II, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Brookhaven National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-SC0012704. SRB acknowledges support for Co-ACCESS from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division. Certain commercial names are mentioned in this manuscript for completeness and do not represent an endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.