Abstract
Accurate estimation under privacy constraints is a critical challenge in modern data analysis, particularly when responses exhibit complex dependence structures and heavy-tailed noise. In this study, we investigate stratified randomized response mechanisms combined with differential privacy (DP), incorporating copula-based modeling to capture dependence between multiple noise components. We consider Laplace and Gaussian noise distributions and examine the effects of copula family, dependence parameter (θ), privacy level (ε), and stratum-specific randomization probabilities on bias and variance. Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate that Laplace noise amplifies variability and is highly sensitive to copula dependence, while Gaussian noise provides more stable estimates. Clayton and Gaussian copulas offer robust performance under moderate dependence, whereas Gumbel copulas exhibit extreme bias and variance under high dependence. Real data analysis using the mtcars dataset corroborates these findings, showing that copula-based modeling improves estimation stability compared to ignoring dependence. Our results provide practical guidance for selecting copula families, noise types, and privacy parameters, highlighting the trade-offs between privacy and statistical accuracy in privacy-preserving data collection.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 217-233 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2026 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 The Korean Statistical Society, and Korean International Statistical Society. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- copula
- differential privacy
- privacy-preserving estimation
- stratified Warner's randomized response
- survey sampling
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Copula-based stratified randomized response for differential privacy: Laplace and Gaussian noise comparisons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS