Convergent validity of and bias in maternal reports of child emotion

C. Emily Durbin, Sylia Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Scopus citations


This study examined the convergent validity of maternal reports of child emotion in a sample of 190 children between the ages of 3 and 6. Children completed a battery of 10 emotion-eliciting laboratory tasks; their mothers and untrained naïve observers rated child emotions (happiness, surprise, fear, sadness, and anger) following each task, and trained coders rated videotapes of each task for the same emotions. Consistent with studies using other designs, maternal reports demonstrated weak to moderate convergence with the other rating methods. Extending prior research, a number of maternal characteristics (particularly lifetime psychiatric diagnoses and personality traits) were associated with their reports of child emotions in the lab, above and beyond the effects of objective coding and observer reports of child emotions. For some emotions, mothers' mental health and dispositional variables were more strongly related to their reports of the child's emotions than were objective indices of the child's observable emotional behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)647-660
Number of pages14
JournalPsychological assessment
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012
Externally publishedYes


  • Bias
  • Convergence
  • Emotion
  • Maternal reports


Dive into the research topics of 'Convergent validity of and bias in maternal reports of child emotion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this