Conventional immunosuppression is compatible with costimulation blockade-based, mixed chimerism tolerance induction

Andrew B. Adams, Nozomu Shirasugi, Thomas R. Jones, Matthew A. Williams, Megan M. Durham, Jongwon Ha, Ying Dong, Zhong Guo, Kenneth A. Newell, Thomas C. Pearson, Christian P. Larsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations


T-cell costimulatory blockade has emerged as an effective strategy to prevent allograft rejection in experimental models. We and others have reported that the beneficial effects of costimulation blockade can be negated when combined with certain immunosuppressants. The current study evaluates the compatibility of various immunosuppressive agents in a costimulation blockade-based, mixed chimerism tolerance protocol. The addition of conventional agents, including calcineurin inhibitors, did not interfere with tolerance induction. All mice developed multilineage macrochimerism and accepted donor allografts. Analysis of specific T-cell receptor utilization demonstrated selective deletion of donor-reactive T cells. Challenge with donor and third-party allografts confirmed donor-specific tolerance. Clinical introduction of costimulation blockade-based strategies will likely incorporate currently approved immunosuppressive agents. While it has been reported that certain conventional agents are detrimental to costimulation blockade-based strategies, our results suggest that these agents could safely be combined in clinical trials when used as part of a nonmyelosuppressive, mixed chimerism-based tolerance strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)895-901
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 2003
Externally publishedYes


  • Costimulatory molecules
  • Immunosuppressive drugs
  • Mixed chimerism
  • Transplantation tolerance


Dive into the research topics of 'Conventional immunosuppression is compatible with costimulation blockade-based, mixed chimerism tolerance induction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this