Convective heat transfer enhancement versus disenhancement: Impact of fluid-mover characteristics

Dat Nguyen, John Gorman, Ephraim Sparrow, John Abraham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract Methods of enhancing heat transfer rates have primarily been based on geometrical modifications and supplementations of basic heat transfer devices. To evaluate the extent of the enhancement (or of a possible disenhancement), it has been traditional to compare the heat transfer performance of the basic and the enhanced devices under certain constraints. Seemingly, the most popular among the constraints is that both the compared devices be operated at the same pumping power. Other popular conditions of constraint include operation at the same pressure drop, mass flow rate, device volume, heat transfer area, temperature difference, and many others. Noteworthy by its absence from consideration as a major factor in affecting the degree of enhancement is the fluid mover that serves to deliver fluid flow to the heat transfer device. The characteristic operating curve of a fluid mover relates its pressure rise to the volumetric flow rate that it provides. The shape of the curve that represents this relationship varies widely among individual fluid movers as well as among different generic types of fluid movers. In the present investigation, the essential role of fluid-mover operating characteristics in affecting heat transfer enhancement is presented and implemented. A case study involving surface geometry enhancement by means of louvered fins is considered along with its unenhanced plain-fin counterpart. For generality, two distinctly different fluid movers are utilized as means of fluid delivery to both the enhanced and unenhanced heat transfer devices. For both of the fluid movers, it was found that the enhanced geometry actually led to a reduction in the rate of heat transfer while giving rise to an increase in pressure drop. It was also shown that enhancement (or disenhancement) depends as much on the characteristics of the fluid mover as it does on the geometry of the heat transfer device in question.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number6774
Pages (from-to)242-249
Number of pages8
JournalApplied Thermal Engineering
Volume90
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 25 2015

Fingerprint

Heat transfer
Fluids
Pressure drop
Geometry
Flow rate
Flow of fluids
Temperature

Keywords

  • Blower curve
  • Heat exchanger
  • Heat transfer enhancement
  • Louvered fins
  • Numerical simulation

Cite this

Convective heat transfer enhancement versus disenhancement : Impact of fluid-mover characteristics. / Nguyen, Dat; Gorman, John; Sparrow, Ephraim; Abraham, John.

In: Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 90, 6774, 25.07.2015, p. 242-249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{016d151b0e444dd08110167d524f1a94,
title = "Convective heat transfer enhancement versus disenhancement: Impact of fluid-mover characteristics",
abstract = "Abstract Methods of enhancing heat transfer rates have primarily been based on geometrical modifications and supplementations of basic heat transfer devices. To evaluate the extent of the enhancement (or of a possible disenhancement), it has been traditional to compare the heat transfer performance of the basic and the enhanced devices under certain constraints. Seemingly, the most popular among the constraints is that both the compared devices be operated at the same pumping power. Other popular conditions of constraint include operation at the same pressure drop, mass flow rate, device volume, heat transfer area, temperature difference, and many others. Noteworthy by its absence from consideration as a major factor in affecting the degree of enhancement is the fluid mover that serves to deliver fluid flow to the heat transfer device. The characteristic operating curve of a fluid mover relates its pressure rise to the volumetric flow rate that it provides. The shape of the curve that represents this relationship varies widely among individual fluid movers as well as among different generic types of fluid movers. In the present investigation, the essential role of fluid-mover operating characteristics in affecting heat transfer enhancement is presented and implemented. A case study involving surface geometry enhancement by means of louvered fins is considered along with its unenhanced plain-fin counterpart. For generality, two distinctly different fluid movers are utilized as means of fluid delivery to both the enhanced and unenhanced heat transfer devices. For both of the fluid movers, it was found that the enhanced geometry actually led to a reduction in the rate of heat transfer while giving rise to an increase in pressure drop. It was also shown that enhancement (or disenhancement) depends as much on the characteristics of the fluid mover as it does on the geometry of the heat transfer device in question.",
keywords = "Blower curve, Heat exchanger, Heat transfer enhancement, Louvered fins, Numerical simulation",
author = "Dat Nguyen and John Gorman and Ephraim Sparrow and John Abraham",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.06.080",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "242--249",
journal = "Applied Thermal Engineering",
issn = "1359-4311",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Convective heat transfer enhancement versus disenhancement

T2 - Impact of fluid-mover characteristics

AU - Nguyen, Dat

AU - Gorman, John

AU - Sparrow, Ephraim

AU - Abraham, John

PY - 2015/7/25

Y1 - 2015/7/25

N2 - Abstract Methods of enhancing heat transfer rates have primarily been based on geometrical modifications and supplementations of basic heat transfer devices. To evaluate the extent of the enhancement (or of a possible disenhancement), it has been traditional to compare the heat transfer performance of the basic and the enhanced devices under certain constraints. Seemingly, the most popular among the constraints is that both the compared devices be operated at the same pumping power. Other popular conditions of constraint include operation at the same pressure drop, mass flow rate, device volume, heat transfer area, temperature difference, and many others. Noteworthy by its absence from consideration as a major factor in affecting the degree of enhancement is the fluid mover that serves to deliver fluid flow to the heat transfer device. The characteristic operating curve of a fluid mover relates its pressure rise to the volumetric flow rate that it provides. The shape of the curve that represents this relationship varies widely among individual fluid movers as well as among different generic types of fluid movers. In the present investigation, the essential role of fluid-mover operating characteristics in affecting heat transfer enhancement is presented and implemented. A case study involving surface geometry enhancement by means of louvered fins is considered along with its unenhanced plain-fin counterpart. For generality, two distinctly different fluid movers are utilized as means of fluid delivery to both the enhanced and unenhanced heat transfer devices. For both of the fluid movers, it was found that the enhanced geometry actually led to a reduction in the rate of heat transfer while giving rise to an increase in pressure drop. It was also shown that enhancement (or disenhancement) depends as much on the characteristics of the fluid mover as it does on the geometry of the heat transfer device in question.

AB - Abstract Methods of enhancing heat transfer rates have primarily been based on geometrical modifications and supplementations of basic heat transfer devices. To evaluate the extent of the enhancement (or of a possible disenhancement), it has been traditional to compare the heat transfer performance of the basic and the enhanced devices under certain constraints. Seemingly, the most popular among the constraints is that both the compared devices be operated at the same pumping power. Other popular conditions of constraint include operation at the same pressure drop, mass flow rate, device volume, heat transfer area, temperature difference, and many others. Noteworthy by its absence from consideration as a major factor in affecting the degree of enhancement is the fluid mover that serves to deliver fluid flow to the heat transfer device. The characteristic operating curve of a fluid mover relates its pressure rise to the volumetric flow rate that it provides. The shape of the curve that represents this relationship varies widely among individual fluid movers as well as among different generic types of fluid movers. In the present investigation, the essential role of fluid-mover operating characteristics in affecting heat transfer enhancement is presented and implemented. A case study involving surface geometry enhancement by means of louvered fins is considered along with its unenhanced plain-fin counterpart. For generality, two distinctly different fluid movers are utilized as means of fluid delivery to both the enhanced and unenhanced heat transfer devices. For both of the fluid movers, it was found that the enhanced geometry actually led to a reduction in the rate of heat transfer while giving rise to an increase in pressure drop. It was also shown that enhancement (or disenhancement) depends as much on the characteristics of the fluid mover as it does on the geometry of the heat transfer device in question.

KW - Blower curve

KW - Heat exchanger

KW - Heat transfer enhancement

KW - Louvered fins

KW - Numerical simulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937884031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937884031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.06.080

DO - 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.06.080

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84937884031

VL - 90

SP - 242

EP - 249

JO - Applied Thermal Engineering

JF - Applied Thermal Engineering

SN - 1359-4311

M1 - 6774

ER -