Control Beliefs and Risk for Death, Stroke and Myocardial Infarction in Middle-aged and Older Adults: An Observational Study

W. Duan-Porter, S.N. Hastings, B. Neelon, C.H. Van Houtven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Chronic health conditions account for the largest proportion of illness-related mortality and morbidity as well as most of healthcare spending in the USA. Control beliefs may be important for outcomes in individuals with chronic illness. Objective: To determine whether control beliefs are associated with the risk for death, incident stroke and incident myocardial infarction (MI), particularly for individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or hypertension. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: A total of 5,662 respondents to the Health and Retirement Study with baseline health, demographic and psychological data in 2006, with no history of previous stroke or MI. Main Measures: Perceived global control, measured as two dimensions—“constraints” and “mastery”—and health-specific control were self-reported. Event-free survival was measured in years, where “event” was the composite of death, incident stroke and MI. Year of stroke or MI was self-reported; year of death was obtained from respondents’ family. Key Results: Mean baseline age was 66.2 years; 994 (16.7 %) had DM and 3,023 (53.4 %) hypertension. Overall, 173 (3.1 %) suffered incident strokes, 129 (2.3 %) had incident MI, and 465 (8.2 %) died. There were no significant interactions between control beliefs and baseline DM or hypertension in predicting event-free survival. Elevated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were associated with DM (1.33, 95 % CI 1.07–1.67), hypertension (1.31, 95 % CI 1.07–1.61) and perceived constraints in the third (1.55, 95 % CI 1.12–2.15) and fourth quartiles (1.61, 95 % CI 1.14–2.26). Health-specific control scores in the third (HR 0.78, 95 % CI 0.59–1.03) and fourth quartiles (HR 0.70, 95 % CI 0.53–0.92) were protective, but only the latter category had a statistically significant decreased risk. Combined high perceived constraints and low health-specific control had the highest risk (HR 1.93, 95 % CI 1.41–2.64). Conclusions: Control beliefs were not associated with differential risk for those with DM and/or hypertension, but they predicted significant differences in event-free survival for the general cohort. © 2015, Society of General Internal Medicine.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1156-1163
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume30
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Observational Studies
Stroke
Myocardial Infarction
Diabetes Mellitus
Hypertension
Health
Disease-Free Survival
Retirement
Chronic Disease
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Odds Ratio
Demography
Psychology
Morbidity
Delivery of Health Care
Mortality
Surveys and Questionnaires

Bibliographical note

Cited By :5

Export Date: 26 December 2018

CODEN: JGIME

Correspondence Address: Duan-Porter, W.; Health Services Research and Development, Durham VA Medical CenterUnited States

Keywords

  • cardiovascular risk
  • control beliefs
  • mortality
  • insulin
  • adult
  • aged
  • Article
  • cerebrovascular accident
  • cohort analysis
  • death
  • demography
  • diabetes mellitus
  • event free survival
  • female
  • health belief
  • heart infarction
  • human
  • hypertension
  • major clinical study
  • male
  • observational study
  • psychological aspect
  • self report
  • attitude to health
  • longitudinal study
  • middle aged
  • patient
  • psychology
  • retrospective study
  • risk factor
  • treatment outcome
  • Aged
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Humans
  • Hypertension
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Patients
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Stroke
  • Treatment Outcome

Cite this

Control Beliefs and Risk for Death, Stroke and Myocardial Infarction in Middle-aged and Older Adults: An Observational Study. / Duan-Porter, W.; Hastings, S.N.; Neelon, B.; Van Houtven, C.H.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 30, No. 8, 2015, p. 1156-1163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b82a5a89c92348dca4ec29156a1e7f05,
title = "Control Beliefs and Risk for Death, Stroke and Myocardial Infarction in Middle-aged and Older Adults: An Observational Study",
abstract = "Background: Chronic health conditions account for the largest proportion of illness-related mortality and morbidity as well as most of healthcare spending in the USA. Control beliefs may be important for outcomes in individuals with chronic illness. Objective: To determine whether control beliefs are associated with the risk for death, incident stroke and incident myocardial infarction (MI), particularly for individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or hypertension. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: A total of 5,662 respondents to the Health and Retirement Study with baseline health, demographic and psychological data in 2006, with no history of previous stroke or MI. Main Measures: Perceived global control, measured as two dimensions—“constraints” and “mastery”—and health-specific control were self-reported. Event-free survival was measured in years, where “event” was the composite of death, incident stroke and MI. Year of stroke or MI was self-reported; year of death was obtained from respondents’ family. Key Results: Mean baseline age was 66.2 years; 994 (16.7 {\%}) had DM and 3,023 (53.4 {\%}) hypertension. Overall, 173 (3.1 {\%}) suffered incident strokes, 129 (2.3 {\%}) had incident MI, and 465 (8.2 {\%}) died. There were no significant interactions between control beliefs and baseline DM or hypertension in predicting event-free survival. Elevated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were associated with DM (1.33, 95 {\%} CI 1.07–1.67), hypertension (1.31, 95 {\%} CI 1.07–1.61) and perceived constraints in the third (1.55, 95 {\%} CI 1.12–2.15) and fourth quartiles (1.61, 95 {\%} CI 1.14–2.26). Health-specific control scores in the third (HR 0.78, 95 {\%} CI 0.59–1.03) and fourth quartiles (HR 0.70, 95 {\%} CI 0.53–0.92) were protective, but only the latter category had a statistically significant decreased risk. Combined high perceived constraints and low health-specific control had the highest risk (HR 1.93, 95 {\%} CI 1.41–2.64). Conclusions: Control beliefs were not associated with differential risk for those with DM and/or hypertension, but they predicted significant differences in event-free survival for the general cohort. {\circledC} 2015, Society of General Internal Medicine.",
keywords = "cardiovascular risk, control beliefs, mortality, insulin, adult, aged, Article, cerebrovascular accident, cohort analysis, death, demography, diabetes mellitus, event free survival, female, health belief, heart infarction, human, hypertension, major clinical study, male, observational study, psychological aspect, self report, attitude to health, longitudinal study, middle aged, patient, psychology, retrospective study, risk factor, treatment outcome, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Hypertension, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Patients, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Stroke, Treatment Outcome",
author = "W. Duan-Porter and S.N. Hastings and B. Neelon and {Van Houtven}, C.H.",
note = "Cited By :5 Export Date: 26 December 2018 CODEN: JGIME Correspondence Address: Duan-Porter, W.; Health Services Research and Development, Durham VA Medical CenterUnited States",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-015-3275-9",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "1156--1163",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York LLC",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Control Beliefs and Risk for Death, Stroke and Myocardial Infarction in Middle-aged and Older Adults: An Observational Study

AU - Duan-Porter, W.

AU - Hastings, S.N.

AU - Neelon, B.

AU - Van Houtven, C.H.

N1 - Cited By :5 Export Date: 26 December 2018 CODEN: JGIME Correspondence Address: Duan-Porter, W.; Health Services Research and Development, Durham VA Medical CenterUnited States

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background: Chronic health conditions account for the largest proportion of illness-related mortality and morbidity as well as most of healthcare spending in the USA. Control beliefs may be important for outcomes in individuals with chronic illness. Objective: To determine whether control beliefs are associated with the risk for death, incident stroke and incident myocardial infarction (MI), particularly for individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or hypertension. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: A total of 5,662 respondents to the Health and Retirement Study with baseline health, demographic and psychological data in 2006, with no history of previous stroke or MI. Main Measures: Perceived global control, measured as two dimensions—“constraints” and “mastery”—and health-specific control were self-reported. Event-free survival was measured in years, where “event” was the composite of death, incident stroke and MI. Year of stroke or MI was self-reported; year of death was obtained from respondents’ family. Key Results: Mean baseline age was 66.2 years; 994 (16.7 %) had DM and 3,023 (53.4 %) hypertension. Overall, 173 (3.1 %) suffered incident strokes, 129 (2.3 %) had incident MI, and 465 (8.2 %) died. There were no significant interactions between control beliefs and baseline DM or hypertension in predicting event-free survival. Elevated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were associated with DM (1.33, 95 % CI 1.07–1.67), hypertension (1.31, 95 % CI 1.07–1.61) and perceived constraints in the third (1.55, 95 % CI 1.12–2.15) and fourth quartiles (1.61, 95 % CI 1.14–2.26). Health-specific control scores in the third (HR 0.78, 95 % CI 0.59–1.03) and fourth quartiles (HR 0.70, 95 % CI 0.53–0.92) were protective, but only the latter category had a statistically significant decreased risk. Combined high perceived constraints and low health-specific control had the highest risk (HR 1.93, 95 % CI 1.41–2.64). Conclusions: Control beliefs were not associated with differential risk for those with DM and/or hypertension, but they predicted significant differences in event-free survival for the general cohort. © 2015, Society of General Internal Medicine.

AB - Background: Chronic health conditions account for the largest proportion of illness-related mortality and morbidity as well as most of healthcare spending in the USA. Control beliefs may be important for outcomes in individuals with chronic illness. Objective: To determine whether control beliefs are associated with the risk for death, incident stroke and incident myocardial infarction (MI), particularly for individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or hypertension. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: A total of 5,662 respondents to the Health and Retirement Study with baseline health, demographic and psychological data in 2006, with no history of previous stroke or MI. Main Measures: Perceived global control, measured as two dimensions—“constraints” and “mastery”—and health-specific control were self-reported. Event-free survival was measured in years, where “event” was the composite of death, incident stroke and MI. Year of stroke or MI was self-reported; year of death was obtained from respondents’ family. Key Results: Mean baseline age was 66.2 years; 994 (16.7 %) had DM and 3,023 (53.4 %) hypertension. Overall, 173 (3.1 %) suffered incident strokes, 129 (2.3 %) had incident MI, and 465 (8.2 %) died. There were no significant interactions between control beliefs and baseline DM or hypertension in predicting event-free survival. Elevated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were associated with DM (1.33, 95 % CI 1.07–1.67), hypertension (1.31, 95 % CI 1.07–1.61) and perceived constraints in the third (1.55, 95 % CI 1.12–2.15) and fourth quartiles (1.61, 95 % CI 1.14–2.26). Health-specific control scores in the third (HR 0.78, 95 % CI 0.59–1.03) and fourth quartiles (HR 0.70, 95 % CI 0.53–0.92) were protective, but only the latter category had a statistically significant decreased risk. Combined high perceived constraints and low health-specific control had the highest risk (HR 1.93, 95 % CI 1.41–2.64). Conclusions: Control beliefs were not associated with differential risk for those with DM and/or hypertension, but they predicted significant differences in event-free survival for the general cohort. © 2015, Society of General Internal Medicine.

KW - cardiovascular risk

KW - control beliefs

KW - mortality

KW - insulin

KW - adult

KW - aged

KW - Article

KW - cerebrovascular accident

KW - cohort analysis

KW - death

KW - demography

KW - diabetes mellitus

KW - event free survival

KW - female

KW - health belief

KW - heart infarction

KW - human

KW - hypertension

KW - major clinical study

KW - male

KW - observational study

KW - psychological aspect

KW - self report

KW - attitude to health

KW - longitudinal study

KW - middle aged

KW - patient

KW - psychology

KW - retrospective study

KW - risk factor

KW - treatment outcome

KW - Aged

KW - Diabetes Mellitus

KW - Female

KW - Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

KW - Humans

KW - Hypertension

KW - Longitudinal Studies

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Myocardial Infarction

KW - Patients

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Stroke

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-015-3275-9

DO - 10.1007/s11606-015-3275-9

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 1156

EP - 1163

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 8

ER -