Abstract
Recent technical advances have demonstrated the importance of pore-scale geochemical processes for governing Earth's evolution. However, the contribution of pores at different scales to overall geochemical reactions remains poorly understood. Here, we integrate multiscale characterisation and reactive transport modelling to study the contribution of pore-scale geochemical processes to the hydrogeochemical evolution of dolomite rock samples during CO2-driven dissolution experiments. Our results demonstrate that approximately half of the total pore volume is invisible at the scale of commonly used imaging techniques. Comparison of pre- and postexperimental analyses demonstrate that porosity-increasing, CO2-driven dissolution processes preferentially occur in pores 600 nm-5 μm in size, but pores <600 nm in size show no change during experimental alteration. This latter observation, combined with the anomalously high rates of trace element release during the experiments, suggests that nanoscale pores are accessible to through-flowing fluids. A three dimensional simulation performed directly on one of the samples shows that steady state pore-scale trace element reaction rates must be ∼10× faster than that of dolomite in order to match measured effluent concentrations, consistent with the large surface area-to-volume ratio and high reactivity of these pores. Together, these results yield a new conceptual model of pore-scale processes, and urge caution when interpreting the trace element concentrations of ancient carbonate rocks.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 42-46 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Geochemical Perspectives Letters |
Volume | 14 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We thank the three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments that helped to improve the clarity of the manuscript. Dr. Xin Gu (Pennsylvania State University) provided scripts for processing autocorrelation data and Hanford Deglint (University of Calgary) helped in creating Figure 2. Research support was provided by the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2018-03800), the Donors of the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund, and the University of Calgary. MOS and X-ZK thank the Werner Siemens-Stiftung (Werner Siemens Foundation) for their support of the Geothermal Energy and Geofluids (GEG.ethz.ch) group at ETH Zurich, Switzerland. NCNR (U)SANS instrumentation was supported in part by the NSF under agreement DMR-0944662, and ISIS beamtime was supported by the Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom RB1610074. ISIS SANS data doi: 10.5286/ISIS.E.RB1610074.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors.