Contributions of empirical research to medical ethics

Robert A. Pearlman, Steven H Miles, Robert M. Arnold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Empirical research pertaining to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), clinician behaviors related to do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and substituted judgment suggests potential contributions to medical ethics. Research quantifying the likelihood of surviving CPR points to the need for further philosophical analysis of the limitations of the patient autonomy in decision making, the nature and definition of medical futility, and the relationship between futility and professional standards. Research on DNR orders has identified barriers to the goal of patient involvement in these life and death discussions. The initial data on surrogate decision making also points to the need for a reexamination of the moral basis for substituted judgment, the moral authority of proxy decision making and the second-order status of the best interests standard. These examples of empirical research suggest that an interplay between empirical research, ethical analysis and policy development may represent a new form of interdisciplinary scholarship to improve clinical medicine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-210
Number of pages14
JournalTheoretical Medicine
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1993

Keywords

  • data
  • empirical research
  • interdisciplinary
  • quantitative research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Contributions of empirical research to medical ethics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this