Contrasting nitrogen and phosphorus budgets in urban watersheds and implications for managing urban water pollution

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Managing excess nutrients remains a major obstacle to improving ecosystem service benefits of urban waters. To inform more ecologically based landscape nutrient management, we compared watershed inputs, outputs, and retention for nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in seven subwatersheds of the Mississippi River in St. Paul, Minnesota. Lawn fertilizer and pet waste dominated N and P inputs, respectively, underscoring the importance of household actions in influencing urban watershed nutrient budgets. Watersheds retained only 22% of net P inputs versus 80% of net N inputs (watershed area-weighted averages, where net inputs equal inputs minus biomass removal) despite relatively low P inputs. In contrast to many nonurban watersheds that exhibit high P retention, these urban watersheds have high street density that enhanced transport of P-rich materials from landscapes to stormwater. High P exports in storm drainage networks and yard waste resulted in net P losses in some watersheds. Comparisons of the N/P stoichiometry of net inputs versus storm drain exports implicated denitrification or leaching to groundwater as a likely fate for retained N. Thus, these urban watersheds exported high quantities of N and P, but via contrasting pathways: P was exported primarily via stormwater runoff, contributing to surface water degradation, whereas N losses additionally contribute to groundwater pollution. Consequently, N management and P management require different strategies, with N management focusing on reducing watershed inputs and P management also focusing on reducing P movement from vegetated landscapes to streets and storm drains.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4177-4182
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume114
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 18 2017

Fingerprint

Water Pollution
Budgets
Phosphorus
Nitrogen
Groundwater
Food
Mississippi
Denitrification
Water
Pets
Fertilizers
Rivers
Biomass
Ecosystem
Drainage

Keywords

  • Eutrophication
  • Nitrogen
  • Phosphorus
  • Stormwater
  • Urban watershed

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Cite this

@article{a6e8987c2fcf43ab9c5e570c1945a0d0,
title = "Contrasting nitrogen and phosphorus budgets in urban watersheds and implications for managing urban water pollution",
abstract = "Managing excess nutrients remains a major obstacle to improving ecosystem service benefits of urban waters. To inform more ecologically based landscape nutrient management, we compared watershed inputs, outputs, and retention for nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in seven subwatersheds of the Mississippi River in St. Paul, Minnesota. Lawn fertilizer and pet waste dominated N and P inputs, respectively, underscoring the importance of household actions in influencing urban watershed nutrient budgets. Watersheds retained only 22{\%} of net P inputs versus 80{\%} of net N inputs (watershed area-weighted averages, where net inputs equal inputs minus biomass removal) despite relatively low P inputs. In contrast to many nonurban watersheds that exhibit high P retention, these urban watersheds have high street density that enhanced transport of P-rich materials from landscapes to stormwater. High P exports in storm drainage networks and yard waste resulted in net P losses in some watersheds. Comparisons of the N/P stoichiometry of net inputs versus storm drain exports implicated denitrification or leaching to groundwater as a likely fate for retained N. Thus, these urban watersheds exported high quantities of N and P, but via contrasting pathways: P was exported primarily via stormwater runoff, contributing to surface water degradation, whereas N losses additionally contribute to groundwater pollution. Consequently, N management and P management require different strategies, with N management focusing on reducing watershed inputs and P management also focusing on reducing P movement from vegetated landscapes to streets and storm drains.",
keywords = "Eutrophication, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Stormwater, Urban watershed",
author = "Hobbie, {Sarah E} and Finlay, {Jacques C} and Janke, {Ben D} and Nidzgorski, {Daniel A.} and Millet, {Dylan B} and Baker, {Lawrence A}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1618536114",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "4177--4182",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrasting nitrogen and phosphorus budgets in urban watersheds and implications for managing urban water pollution

AU - Hobbie, Sarah E

AU - Finlay, Jacques C

AU - Janke, Ben D

AU - Nidzgorski, Daniel A.

AU - Millet, Dylan B

AU - Baker, Lawrence A

PY - 2017/4/18

Y1 - 2017/4/18

N2 - Managing excess nutrients remains a major obstacle to improving ecosystem service benefits of urban waters. To inform more ecologically based landscape nutrient management, we compared watershed inputs, outputs, and retention for nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in seven subwatersheds of the Mississippi River in St. Paul, Minnesota. Lawn fertilizer and pet waste dominated N and P inputs, respectively, underscoring the importance of household actions in influencing urban watershed nutrient budgets. Watersheds retained only 22% of net P inputs versus 80% of net N inputs (watershed area-weighted averages, where net inputs equal inputs minus biomass removal) despite relatively low P inputs. In contrast to many nonurban watersheds that exhibit high P retention, these urban watersheds have high street density that enhanced transport of P-rich materials from landscapes to stormwater. High P exports in storm drainage networks and yard waste resulted in net P losses in some watersheds. Comparisons of the N/P stoichiometry of net inputs versus storm drain exports implicated denitrification or leaching to groundwater as a likely fate for retained N. Thus, these urban watersheds exported high quantities of N and P, but via contrasting pathways: P was exported primarily via stormwater runoff, contributing to surface water degradation, whereas N losses additionally contribute to groundwater pollution. Consequently, N management and P management require different strategies, with N management focusing on reducing watershed inputs and P management also focusing on reducing P movement from vegetated landscapes to streets and storm drains.

AB - Managing excess nutrients remains a major obstacle to improving ecosystem service benefits of urban waters. To inform more ecologically based landscape nutrient management, we compared watershed inputs, outputs, and retention for nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in seven subwatersheds of the Mississippi River in St. Paul, Minnesota. Lawn fertilizer and pet waste dominated N and P inputs, respectively, underscoring the importance of household actions in influencing urban watershed nutrient budgets. Watersheds retained only 22% of net P inputs versus 80% of net N inputs (watershed area-weighted averages, where net inputs equal inputs minus biomass removal) despite relatively low P inputs. In contrast to many nonurban watersheds that exhibit high P retention, these urban watersheds have high street density that enhanced transport of P-rich materials from landscapes to stormwater. High P exports in storm drainage networks and yard waste resulted in net P losses in some watersheds. Comparisons of the N/P stoichiometry of net inputs versus storm drain exports implicated denitrification or leaching to groundwater as a likely fate for retained N. Thus, these urban watersheds exported high quantities of N and P, but via contrasting pathways: P was exported primarily via stormwater runoff, contributing to surface water degradation, whereas N losses additionally contribute to groundwater pollution. Consequently, N management and P management require different strategies, with N management focusing on reducing watershed inputs and P management also focusing on reducing P movement from vegetated landscapes to streets and storm drains.

KW - Eutrophication

KW - Nitrogen

KW - Phosphorus

KW - Stormwater

KW - Urban watershed

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017584775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017584775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1618536114

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1618536114

M3 - Article

VL - 114

SP - 4177

EP - 4182

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 16

ER -