Contingency judgment: Primacy effects and attention decrement

J. Frank Yates; Shawn P. Curley

doi:10.1016/0001-6918(86)90092-2

Contingency judgment: Primacy effects and attention decrement

J. Frank Yates, Shawn P. Curley

Information and Decision Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

65 Scopus citations

Abstract

Subjects made judgments concerning the strength and direction of the contingency between two dichotomous variables in a situation in which no contingency actually existed. The judgments exhibited a significant primacy effect. The effects of warning and not warning the subjects that they would be required to recall the frequencies of observed event co-occurrences implied that this primacy effect was due to 'attention decrement' (Anderson 1981). According to this hypothesis, attention to contingency-relevant information diminishes after the subject is exposed to only a small portion of the available information.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	293-302
Number of pages	10
Journal	Acta Psychologica
Volume	62
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(86)90092-2
State	Published - Aug 1986

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Robert Revnew for his assistance in carrying out the reported in part by U.S. National Institute of Mental Health Grant

Publisher link

10.1016/0001-6918(86)90092-2

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{292bfaecb53d44dd9f1ace1be62e64e8,

title = "Contingency judgment: Primacy effects and attention decrement",

abstract = "Subjects made judgments concerning the strength and direction of the contingency between two dichotomous variables in a situation in which no contingency actually existed. The judgments exhibited a significant primacy effect. The effects of warning and not warning the subjects that they would be required to recall the frequencies of observed event co-occurrences implied that this primacy effect was due to 'attention decrement' (Anderson 1981). According to this hypothesis, attention to contingency-relevant information diminishes after the subject is exposed to only a small portion of the available information.",

author = "Yates, {J. Frank} and Curley, {Shawn P.}",

note = "Funding Information: Robert Revnew for his assistance in carrying out the reported in part by U.S. National Institute of Mental Health Grant",

year = "1986",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1016/0001-6918(86)90092-2",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "62",

pages = "293--302",

journal = "Acta Psychologica",

issn = "0001-6918",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contingency judgment

T2 - Primacy effects and attention decrement

AU - Yates, J. Frank

AU - Curley, Shawn P.

N1 - Funding Information: Robert Revnew for his assistance in carrying out the reported in part by U.S. National Institute of Mental Health Grant

PY - 1986/8

Y1 - 1986/8

N2 - Subjects made judgments concerning the strength and direction of the contingency between two dichotomous variables in a situation in which no contingency actually existed. The judgments exhibited a significant primacy effect. The effects of warning and not warning the subjects that they would be required to recall the frequencies of observed event co-occurrences implied that this primacy effect was due to 'attention decrement' (Anderson 1981). According to this hypothesis, attention to contingency-relevant information diminishes after the subject is exposed to only a small portion of the available information.

AB - Subjects made judgments concerning the strength and direction of the contingency between two dichotomous variables in a situation in which no contingency actually existed. The judgments exhibited a significant primacy effect. The effects of warning and not warning the subjects that they would be required to recall the frequencies of observed event co-occurrences implied that this primacy effect was due to 'attention decrement' (Anderson 1981). According to this hypothesis, attention to contingency-relevant information diminishes after the subject is exposed to only a small portion of the available information.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022761141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022761141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0001-6918(86)90092-2

DO - 10.1016/0001-6918(86)90092-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 3766201

AN - SCOPUS:0022761141

SN - 0001-6918

VL - 62

SP - 293

EP - 302

JO - Acta Psychologica

JF - Acta Psychologica

IS - 3

ER -

Contingency judgment: Primacy effects and attention decrement

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this