Context dependence of local adaptation to abiotic and biotic environments: A quantitative and qualitative synthesis

Ryan D.Briscoe Runquist, Amanda J. Gorton, Jeremy B. Yoder, Nicholas J. Deacon, Jake J. Grossman, Shan Kothari, Marta P. Lyons, Seema N. Sheth, Peter Tiffin, David A. Moeller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Understanding how spatially variable selection shapes adaptation is an area of long-standing interest in evolutionary ecology. Recent meta-analyses have quantified the extent of local adaptation, but the relative importance of abiotic and biotic factors in driving population divergence remains poorly understood. To address this gap, we combined a quantitative meta-analysis and a qualitative metasynthesis to (1) quantify the magnitude of local adaptation to abiotic and biotic factors and (2) characterize major themes that influence the motivation and design of experiments that seek to test for local adaptation. Using local-foreign contrasts as a metric of local adaptation (or maladaptation), we found that local adaptation was greater in the presence than in the absence of a biotic interactor, especially for plants. We also found that biotic environments had stronger effects on fitness than abiotic environments when ignoring whether those environments were local versus foreign. Finally, biotic effects were stronger at low latitudes, and abiotic effects were stronger at high latitudes. Our qualitative analysis revealed that the lens through which local adaptation has been examined differs for abiotic and biotic factors. It also revealed biases in the design and implementation of experiments that make quantitative results challenging to interpret and provided directions for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)412-431
Number of pages20
JournalAmerican Naturalist
Volume195
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2020

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Latitudinal gradient
  • Life history
  • Meta-analysis
  • Metasynthesis
  • Natural selection
  • Reciprocal transplant

Cite this

Runquist, R. D. B., Gorton, A. J., Yoder, J. B., Deacon, N. J., Grossman, J. J., Kothari, S., Lyons, M. P., Sheth, S. N., Tiffin, P., & Moeller, D. A. (2020). Context dependence of local adaptation to abiotic and biotic environments: A quantitative and qualitative synthesis. American Naturalist, 195(3), 412-431. https://doi.org/10.1086/707322