Contested or established? A comparison of legislative powers across regimes

Matthew Charles Wilson, Josef Woldense

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

In research on authoritarian institutions, legislatures are portrayed as capable of resolving dilemmas between the leader and opposition members. Nevertheless, repeated interactions between a leader and their ruling coalition can lead to both contested dictatorships, in which institutions constrain the leader, and established dictatorships, in which the leader exercises near-complete control. To date, however, no one has examined the patterns by which powers vary across legislatures in different settings and over time. Using data from the Varieties of Democracy Project on legislative powers between 1900 and 2017, we conceptualize changes in the powers afforded to the national congress to characterize the development of regimes in either direction. The study expounds on the content of legislatures across regimes and the ways in which they change, encouraging scholars to further consider the relationship between regime dynamics and legislative institutionalization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)585-605
Number of pages21
JournalDemocratization
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research project was supported by European Research Council [grant number 724191], PI: Staffan I. Lindberg; as well as by internal grants from the Vice-Chancellor’s office, the Dean of the College of Social Sciences, and the Department of Political Science at University of Gothenburg.

Keywords

  • autocracy
  • institutions
  • legislatures
  • powers
  • regimes
  • strength

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Contested or established? A comparison of legislative powers across regimes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this