Content versus graphics in the ecological design of interfaces

Randy J. Pagulayan; Thomas A. Stoffregen

Content versus graphics in the ecological design of interfaces

Randy J. Pagulayan
, Thomas A. Stoffregen

Kinesiology

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

The distinction between content and graphics in the ecological interface design (EID) is discussed. EID indicates what affordances should be represented in a display, but it provides little or no guidance about what the display should look like. EID is a theory of interface content and not a theory of interface graphics. The term graphics refers to the appearance of a display or what an interface looks like.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for the New Millenium
Number of pages	1
State	Published - Dec 1 2000
Event	Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium' - San Diego, CA, United States Duration: Jul 29 2000 → Aug 4 2000

Other

Other	Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium'
Country/Territory	United States
City	San Diego, CA
Period	7/29/00 → 8/4/00

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

Content versus graphics in the ecological design of interfaces. / Pagulayan, Randy J.; Stoffregen, Thomas A.
Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for the New Millenium. 2000.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Pagulayan, RJ & Stoffregen, TA 2000, Content versus graphics in the ecological design of interfaces. in Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for the New Millenium. Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium', San Diego, CA, United States, 7/29/00.

@inproceedings{a014b5616e404bffa01651c7173a7f7a,

title = "Content versus graphics in the ecological design of interfaces",

abstract = "The distinction between content and graphics in the ecological interface design (EID) is discussed. EID indicates what affordances should be represented in a display, but it provides little or no guidance about what the display should look like. EID is a theory of interface content and not a theory of interface graphics. The term graphics refers to the appearance of a display or what an interface looks like.",

author = "Pagulayan, \{Randy J.\} and Stoffregen, \{Thomas A.\}",

year = "2000",

month = dec,

day = "1",

language = "English (US)",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for the New Millenium",

note = "Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium' ; Conference date: 29-07-2000 Through 04-08-2000",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Content versus graphics in the ecological design of interfaces

AU - Pagulayan, Randy J.

AU - Stoffregen, Thomas A.

PY - 2000/12/1

Y1 - 2000/12/1

N2 - The distinction between content and graphics in the ecological interface design (EID) is discussed. EID indicates what affordances should be represented in a display, but it provides little or no guidance about what the display should look like. EID is a theory of interface content and not a theory of interface graphics. The term graphics refers to the appearance of a display or what an interface looks like.

AB - The distinction between content and graphics in the ecological interface design (EID) is discussed. EID indicates what affordances should be represented in a display, but it provides little or no guidance about what the display should look like. EID is a theory of interface content and not a theory of interface graphics. The term graphics refers to the appearance of a display or what an interface looks like.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/1842688196

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/1842688196#tab=citedBy

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:1842688196

BT - Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for the New Millenium

T2 - Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium'

Y2 - 29 July 2000 through 4 August 2000

ER -

Content versus graphics in the ecological design of interfaces

Abstract

Other

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this