TY - JOUR
T1 - Consumption of 'low-yield' cigarettes
T2 - Its frequency and relationship to serum thiocyanate
AU - Folsom, A. R.
AU - Pechacek, T. F.
AU - de Gaudemaris, R.
AU - Luepker, R. V.
AU - Jacobs, D. R.
AU - Gillum, R. F.
PY - 1984
Y1 - 1984
N2 - To determine the use of possible health risks of low-yield cigarettes, we ascertained the cigarette brands and serum thiocyanate (SCN) levels of 2.561 adult smokers (age 25-74) in population-based samples of seven upper Midwestern communities during 1980-82. Brands were coded according to December 1981 Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rating for 'tar', nicotine, and carbon monoxide (CO). Compared to 1980 data from the National Center for Health Statistics for the United States as a whole, a greater proportion of smokers in these communities smoked low-yield brands. More people with higher education than lesser and more women than man smoked low-yield cigarettes. Greater proportions of older people (65-75 years) than younger people (< 65 years) smoked cigarettes in the highest and lowest brand yield categories. SCN, adjusted for number of cigarettes smoked and for sex, was only weakly associated with brand ratings for 'tar' (r = + .12), nicotine (R = + .11), and CO (r = + .15). Furthermore, the gradient in SCN between lowest and highest quintiles of brand strength was less than 16 per cent - much lower than the 300-500 per cent gradient in smoke components implied by FTC rating. These data add to the evidence that smoking low-yield cigarettes may not be significantly less hazardous than smoking high-yield brands.
AB - To determine the use of possible health risks of low-yield cigarettes, we ascertained the cigarette brands and serum thiocyanate (SCN) levels of 2.561 adult smokers (age 25-74) in population-based samples of seven upper Midwestern communities during 1980-82. Brands were coded according to December 1981 Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rating for 'tar', nicotine, and carbon monoxide (CO). Compared to 1980 data from the National Center for Health Statistics for the United States as a whole, a greater proportion of smokers in these communities smoked low-yield brands. More people with higher education than lesser and more women than man smoked low-yield cigarettes. Greater proportions of older people (65-75 years) than younger people (< 65 years) smoked cigarettes in the highest and lowest brand yield categories. SCN, adjusted for number of cigarettes smoked and for sex, was only weakly associated with brand ratings for 'tar' (r = + .12), nicotine (R = + .11), and CO (r = + .15). Furthermore, the gradient in SCN between lowest and highest quintiles of brand strength was less than 16 per cent - much lower than the 300-500 per cent gradient in smoke components implied by FTC rating. These data add to the evidence that smoking low-yield cigarettes may not be significantly less hazardous than smoking high-yield brands.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021332783&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021332783&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.74.6.564
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.74.6.564
M3 - Article
C2 - 6426329
AN - SCOPUS:0021332783
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 74
SP - 564
EP - 568
JO - American journal of public health
JF - American journal of public health
IS - 6
ER -