Considering supervision measures: a commentary on Li et al.’s (2024) scoping review

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This commentary on the Li et al. (2024) scoping review provides our perspectives on the strengths of this scoping review, challenges to scoping reviews in supervision research, future areas to build on this work, and suggests additional supervision measurement evaluation criteria. We hope our comments will spur further work building on this review to improve the feasibility and validity of supervision measures, to build an evidence-base for supervision, and crucially, to support supervisors and supervisees to deliver high-quality mental health care across the globe.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)243-247
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Supervisor
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Keywords

  • commentary
  • measurement
  • Scoping review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Considering supervision measures: a commentary on Li et al.’s (2024) scoping review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this