Connections Between Family Communication Patterns, Person-Centered Message Evaluations, and Emotion Regulation Strategies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

In this study, we theorize that family communication patterns (FCPs) and 2 emotion regulation strategies (reappraisal and suppression) explain variations in person-centered (PC) supportive message evaluations. Specifically, we forward an emotion regulation model that predicts reappraisal and suppression will mediate the relation between FCPs and PC message evaluations. Results (N = 361) suggest that conversation orientation positively predicted reappraisal and negatively predicted suppression; conformity orientation positively predicted suppression only. Reappraisal positively and suppression negatively predicted the extent to which people discriminated among PC message evaluations. Reappraisal also mediated the relation between conversation orientation and PC message evaluations. These results have implications for how capable people are to evaluate and ultimately profit from beneficial support when coping with negative emotions.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages237-255
Number of pages19
JournalHuman Communication Research
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

communication pattern
suppression
Emotions
emotion
Communication
human being
evaluation
Profitability
conversation
conformity
coping
profit

Keywords

  • Comforting
  • Human Information Processing
  • Social Support
  • Socialization
  • Stress

Cite this

@article{80be3eee2b6f411295c4d8ab79ae1f84,
title = "Connections Between Family Communication Patterns, Person-Centered Message Evaluations, and Emotion Regulation Strategies",
abstract = "In this study, we theorize that family communication patterns (FCPs) and 2 emotion regulation strategies (reappraisal and suppression) explain variations in person-centered (PC) supportive message evaluations. Specifically, we forward an emotion regulation model that predicts reappraisal and suppression will mediate the relation between FCPs and PC message evaluations. Results (N = 361) suggest that conversation orientation positively predicted reappraisal and negatively predicted suppression; conformity orientation positively predicted suppression only. Reappraisal positively and suppression negatively predicted the extent to which people discriminated among PC message evaluations. Reappraisal also mediated the relation between conversation orientation and PC message evaluations. These results have implications for how capable people are to evaluate and ultimately profit from beneficial support when coping with negative emotions.",
keywords = "Comforting, Human Information Processing, Social Support, Socialization, Stress",
author = "Jones, {Susanne M.} and Bodie, {Graham D.} and Koerner, {Ascan F.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/hcre.12103",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "237--255",
journal = "Human Communication Research",
issn = "0360-3989",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Connections Between Family Communication Patterns, Person-Centered Message Evaluations, and Emotion Regulation Strategies

AU - Jones,Susanne M.

AU - Bodie,Graham D.

AU - Koerner,Ascan F.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - In this study, we theorize that family communication patterns (FCPs) and 2 emotion regulation strategies (reappraisal and suppression) explain variations in person-centered (PC) supportive message evaluations. Specifically, we forward an emotion regulation model that predicts reappraisal and suppression will mediate the relation between FCPs and PC message evaluations. Results (N = 361) suggest that conversation orientation positively predicted reappraisal and negatively predicted suppression; conformity orientation positively predicted suppression only. Reappraisal positively and suppression negatively predicted the extent to which people discriminated among PC message evaluations. Reappraisal also mediated the relation between conversation orientation and PC message evaluations. These results have implications for how capable people are to evaluate and ultimately profit from beneficial support when coping with negative emotions.

AB - In this study, we theorize that family communication patterns (FCPs) and 2 emotion regulation strategies (reappraisal and suppression) explain variations in person-centered (PC) supportive message evaluations. Specifically, we forward an emotion regulation model that predicts reappraisal and suppression will mediate the relation between FCPs and PC message evaluations. Results (N = 361) suggest that conversation orientation positively predicted reappraisal and negatively predicted suppression; conformity orientation positively predicted suppression only. Reappraisal positively and suppression negatively predicted the extent to which people discriminated among PC message evaluations. Reappraisal also mediated the relation between conversation orientation and PC message evaluations. These results have implications for how capable people are to evaluate and ultimately profit from beneficial support when coping with negative emotions.

KW - Comforting

KW - Human Information Processing

KW - Social Support

KW - Socialization

KW - Stress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85005868608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85005868608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/hcre.12103

DO - 10.1111/hcre.12103

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 237

EP - 255

JO - Human Communication Research

T2 - Human Communication Research

JF - Human Communication Research

SN - 0360-3989

IS - 2

ER -