Abstract
Extensive cognitive research has been devoted to the sensitivity of the visual system to invariant statistical information. For example, many studies have shown that performance improves when a visual display is presented repeatedly. But what allows humans to connect the current visual input to previous memory? Is the connection made only when the entire incoming display matches with a previous memory, or can retrieval rely on an incomplete match between the input and a learned display? Using a visual search task, we show that (1) once a repeated display is learned, subjects can retrieve it even when an incoming display only matches it in 3-4 locations; (2) however, early during learning, repetition of a small proportion of a display is not enough to establish a strong memory trace for the repeated locations. We suggest that the retrieval of a well-established visual memory can proceed even if an incoming display partly matches the previous memory.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 322-330 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of vision |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 14 2005 |
Keywords
- Contexual cueing
- Implicit visual learning
- Visual search
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Connecting the past with the present: How do humans match an incoming visual display with visual memory?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS