Abstract
Confidence intervals and p-values are widely used in the urological literature to describe and interpret outcomes. However, several readers, authors and reviewers are unfamiliar with the true interpretation of these values. P-values determine statistical significance of data. Confidence intervals characterize a range of values in which the true effect size is suggested to be with a given degree of certainty. An independent but complementary interpretation of both values is important in studies with and without statistical significance. Based on a clinical case scenario this article discusses the interpretation as well as common pitfalls in interpretation of p-values and confidence intervals. An accurate assessment of these statistical cornerstones is fundamental for a correct interpretation of the urological literature and thus important aspects of evidence-based urology.
| Translated title of the contribution | Confidence intervals and p-values in urology: Interpretation and misinterpretation |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Pages (from-to) | 546-548 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Urologe - Ausgabe A |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2013 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright:Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Evidence-based medicine
- Misinterpretation
- Probability
- Significance, statistical
- Therapy success