Abstract
Probabilistic forecasts have good ‘external correspondence’ if events that are assigned probabilities close to 1 tend to occur frequently, whereas those assigned probabilities near 0 tend to occur rarely. This paper describes simple procedures for analysing external correspondence into meaningful components that might guide efforts to understand and improve forecasting performance. The procedures focus on differences between the judgements made by the forecaster when the target event occurs, as compared to when it does not. The illustrations involve a professional oddsmaker's predictions of baseball game outcomes, meteorologists' precipitation forecasts and physicians' diagnoses of pneumonia. The illustrations demonstrate the ability of the procedures to highlight important forecasting tendencies that are sometimes more difficult to discern by other means.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 61-73 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Forecasting |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1985 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- External correspondence
- Probabilistic forecasts
- Scoring rule
- Subjective probability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Conditional distribution analyses of probabilistic forecasts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS