Concepts, categories, and compliance in the regulatory state

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When someone calls a dog a cow and then seeks a subsidy provided by statute for cows, the obvious response is that this is not what the statute means. It may also happen that rich people who would not otherwise have cows buy them to gain cow subsidies. Here, when people say (as they do) that this is not what the statute means, they are in fact saying something quite different.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1151-1201
Number of pages51
JournalMinnesota law review
Volume94
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1 2010

Fingerprint

statute
subsidy

Cite this

Concepts, categories, and compliance in the regulatory state. / Hickman, Kristin E.; Hill, Claire A.

In: Minnesota law review, Vol. 94, No. 4, 01.04.2010, p. 1151-1201.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{16c116c760d4465f89018cf5407b8b1d,
title = "Concepts, categories, and compliance in the regulatory state",
abstract = "When someone calls a dog a cow and then seeks a subsidy provided by statute for cows, the obvious response is that this is not what the statute means. It may also happen that rich people who would not otherwise have cows buy them to gain cow subsidies. Here, when people say (as they do) that this is not what the statute means, they are in fact saying something quite different.",
author = "Hickman, {Kristin E.} and Hill, {Claire A.}",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "1151--1201",
journal = "Minnesota Law Review",
issn = "0026-5535",
publisher = "University of Minnesota",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concepts, categories, and compliance in the regulatory state

AU - Hickman, Kristin E.

AU - Hill, Claire A.

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - When someone calls a dog a cow and then seeks a subsidy provided by statute for cows, the obvious response is that this is not what the statute means. It may also happen that rich people who would not otherwise have cows buy them to gain cow subsidies. Here, when people say (as they do) that this is not what the statute means, they are in fact saying something quite different.

AB - When someone calls a dog a cow and then seeks a subsidy provided by statute for cows, the obvious response is that this is not what the statute means. It may also happen that rich people who would not otherwise have cows buy them to gain cow subsidies. Here, when people say (as they do) that this is not what the statute means, they are in fact saying something quite different.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957366206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957366206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:77957366206

VL - 94

SP - 1151

EP - 1201

JO - Minnesota Law Review

JF - Minnesota Law Review

SN - 0026-5535

IS - 4

ER -