Concentration–discharge relationships describe solute and sediment mobilization, reaction, and transport at event and longer timescales

Lucy A. Rose, Diana L Karwan, Sarah E. Godsey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Concentration–discharge (C-Q) relationships reflect material sources, storage, reaction, proximity, and transport in catchments. Differences in hydrologic pathways and connectivity influence observed C-Q patterns at the catchment outlet. We examined solute and sediment C-Q relationships at event and interannual timescales in a small mid-Atlantic (USA) catchment. We found systematic differences in the C-Q behaviour of geogenic/exogenous solutes (e.g., calcium and nitrate), biologically associated solutes (e.g., dissolved organic carbon), and particulate materials (e.g., total suspended solids). Negative log(C)–log(Q) regression slopes, indicating dilution, were common for geogenic solutes whereas positive slopes, indicating concentration increase, were common for biologically associated solutes. Biologically associated solutes often exhibited counterclockwise hysteresis during events whereas geogenic solutes exhibited clockwise hysteresis. Across event and interannual timescales, solute C-Q patterns are linked to the spatial distribution of hydrologic sources and the timing and sequence of hydro-biogeochemical source contributions to the stream. Groundwater is the primary source of stormflow during the earliest and latest stages of events, whereas precipitation and soil water become increasingly connected to the stream near peakflow. This sequence and timing of flowpath connectivity results in dilution and clockwise hysteresis for geogenic/exogenous solutes and concentration increase and counterclockwise hysteresis for biologically associated solutes. Particulate materials demonstrated positive C-Q slopes over the long-term and clockwise hysteresis during individual events. Drivers of particulate and solute C-Q relationships differ, based on longitudinal and lateral expansion of active channels and changing shear stresses with increasing flows. Although important distinctions exist between the drivers of solute and sediment C-Q relationships, overall solute and sediment C-Q patterns at event and interannual timescales reflect consistent catchment hydro-biogeochemical processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2829-2844
Number of pages16
JournalHydrological Processes
Volume32
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 30 2018

Fingerprint

solute
timescale
hysteresis
catchment
sediment mobilisation
connectivity
dilution
sediment
dissolved organic carbon
shear stress
soil water
calcium
spatial distribution
nitrate
groundwater

Keywords

  • C-Q
  • concentration–discharge
  • hysteresis
  • storm event

Cite this

@article{1237cfc9ba8948c1aeb63204aede1097,
title = "Concentration–discharge relationships describe solute and sediment mobilization, reaction, and transport at event and longer timescales",
abstract = "Concentration–discharge (C-Q) relationships reflect material sources, storage, reaction, proximity, and transport in catchments. Differences in hydrologic pathways and connectivity influence observed C-Q patterns at the catchment outlet. We examined solute and sediment C-Q relationships at event and interannual timescales in a small mid-Atlantic (USA) catchment. We found systematic differences in the C-Q behaviour of geogenic/exogenous solutes (e.g., calcium and nitrate), biologically associated solutes (e.g., dissolved organic carbon), and particulate materials (e.g., total suspended solids). Negative log(C)–log(Q) regression slopes, indicating dilution, were common for geogenic solutes whereas positive slopes, indicating concentration increase, were common for biologically associated solutes. Biologically associated solutes often exhibited counterclockwise hysteresis during events whereas geogenic solutes exhibited clockwise hysteresis. Across event and interannual timescales, solute C-Q patterns are linked to the spatial distribution of hydrologic sources and the timing and sequence of hydro-biogeochemical source contributions to the stream. Groundwater is the primary source of stormflow during the earliest and latest stages of events, whereas precipitation and soil water become increasingly connected to the stream near peakflow. This sequence and timing of flowpath connectivity results in dilution and clockwise hysteresis for geogenic/exogenous solutes and concentration increase and counterclockwise hysteresis for biologically associated solutes. Particulate materials demonstrated positive C-Q slopes over the long-term and clockwise hysteresis during individual events. Drivers of particulate and solute C-Q relationships differ, based on longitudinal and lateral expansion of active channels and changing shear stresses with increasing flows. Although important distinctions exist between the drivers of solute and sediment C-Q relationships, overall solute and sediment C-Q patterns at event and interannual timescales reflect consistent catchment hydro-biogeochemical processes.",
keywords = "C-Q, concentration–discharge, hysteresis, storm event",
author = "Rose, {Lucy A.} and Karwan, {Diana L} and Godsey, {Sarah E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1002/hyp.13235",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "2829--2844",
journal = "Hydrological Processes",
issn = "0885-6087",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "18",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concentration–discharge relationships describe solute and sediment mobilization, reaction, and transport at event and longer timescales

AU - Rose, Lucy A.

AU - Karwan, Diana L

AU - Godsey, Sarah E.

PY - 2018/8/30

Y1 - 2018/8/30

N2 - Concentration–discharge (C-Q) relationships reflect material sources, storage, reaction, proximity, and transport in catchments. Differences in hydrologic pathways and connectivity influence observed C-Q patterns at the catchment outlet. We examined solute and sediment C-Q relationships at event and interannual timescales in a small mid-Atlantic (USA) catchment. We found systematic differences in the C-Q behaviour of geogenic/exogenous solutes (e.g., calcium and nitrate), biologically associated solutes (e.g., dissolved organic carbon), and particulate materials (e.g., total suspended solids). Negative log(C)–log(Q) regression slopes, indicating dilution, were common for geogenic solutes whereas positive slopes, indicating concentration increase, were common for biologically associated solutes. Biologically associated solutes often exhibited counterclockwise hysteresis during events whereas geogenic solutes exhibited clockwise hysteresis. Across event and interannual timescales, solute C-Q patterns are linked to the spatial distribution of hydrologic sources and the timing and sequence of hydro-biogeochemical source contributions to the stream. Groundwater is the primary source of stormflow during the earliest and latest stages of events, whereas precipitation and soil water become increasingly connected to the stream near peakflow. This sequence and timing of flowpath connectivity results in dilution and clockwise hysteresis for geogenic/exogenous solutes and concentration increase and counterclockwise hysteresis for biologically associated solutes. Particulate materials demonstrated positive C-Q slopes over the long-term and clockwise hysteresis during individual events. Drivers of particulate and solute C-Q relationships differ, based on longitudinal and lateral expansion of active channels and changing shear stresses with increasing flows. Although important distinctions exist between the drivers of solute and sediment C-Q relationships, overall solute and sediment C-Q patterns at event and interannual timescales reflect consistent catchment hydro-biogeochemical processes.

AB - Concentration–discharge (C-Q) relationships reflect material sources, storage, reaction, proximity, and transport in catchments. Differences in hydrologic pathways and connectivity influence observed C-Q patterns at the catchment outlet. We examined solute and sediment C-Q relationships at event and interannual timescales in a small mid-Atlantic (USA) catchment. We found systematic differences in the C-Q behaviour of geogenic/exogenous solutes (e.g., calcium and nitrate), biologically associated solutes (e.g., dissolved organic carbon), and particulate materials (e.g., total suspended solids). Negative log(C)–log(Q) regression slopes, indicating dilution, were common for geogenic solutes whereas positive slopes, indicating concentration increase, were common for biologically associated solutes. Biologically associated solutes often exhibited counterclockwise hysteresis during events whereas geogenic solutes exhibited clockwise hysteresis. Across event and interannual timescales, solute C-Q patterns are linked to the spatial distribution of hydrologic sources and the timing and sequence of hydro-biogeochemical source contributions to the stream. Groundwater is the primary source of stormflow during the earliest and latest stages of events, whereas precipitation and soil water become increasingly connected to the stream near peakflow. This sequence and timing of flowpath connectivity results in dilution and clockwise hysteresis for geogenic/exogenous solutes and concentration increase and counterclockwise hysteresis for biologically associated solutes. Particulate materials demonstrated positive C-Q slopes over the long-term and clockwise hysteresis during individual events. Drivers of particulate and solute C-Q relationships differ, based on longitudinal and lateral expansion of active channels and changing shear stresses with increasing flows. Although important distinctions exist between the drivers of solute and sediment C-Q relationships, overall solute and sediment C-Q patterns at event and interannual timescales reflect consistent catchment hydro-biogeochemical processes.

KW - C-Q

KW - concentration–discharge

KW - hysteresis

KW - storm event

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051036979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051036979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hyp.13235

DO - 10.1002/hyp.13235

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 2829

EP - 2844

JO - Hydrological Processes

JF - Hydrological Processes

SN - 0885-6087

IS - 18

ER -