Compulsory project-level involvement and the use of program-level evaluations: Evaluating the local systemic change for teacher enhancement program

Kelli Johnson, Iris R. Weiss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) contracted with principal investigator Iris Weiss and an evaluation team at Horizon Research, Inc. (HRI) to conduct a national evaluation of the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program (LSC). HRI conducted the core evaluation under a $6.25 million contract with NSF. This program evaluation project, called the LSC core evaluation, had an overarching program-wide focus that included all 88 local LSC projects. The LSC core evaluation was a large, multisite program evaluation that included multiple data-collection and information-dissemination activities. Each local LSC project was required to have a project-level evaluator, to collect information by using predesigned data-collection instruments developed by HRI, and to report findings to the core evaluation on a regular basis. This case study describes the relationship between project-level involvement in the LSC core evaluation and the use of the core evaluation by project leaders and evaluators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-23
Number of pages7
JournalNew Directions for Evaluation
Volume129
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011

Fingerprint

teacher
evaluation
Systemic change
Evaluation
Enhancement
science
leader
Evaluator
Data collection
Program evaluation

Cite this

@article{602a5bf72e6042b6a03e1a6c089175b5,
title = "Compulsory project-level involvement and the use of program-level evaluations: Evaluating the local systemic change for teacher enhancement program",
abstract = "In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) contracted with principal investigator Iris Weiss and an evaluation team at Horizon Research, Inc. (HRI) to conduct a national evaluation of the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program (LSC). HRI conducted the core evaluation under a $6.25 million contract with NSF. This program evaluation project, called the LSC core evaluation, had an overarching program-wide focus that included all 88 local LSC projects. The LSC core evaluation was a large, multisite program evaluation that included multiple data-collection and information-dissemination activities. Each local LSC project was required to have a project-level evaluator, to collect information by using predesigned data-collection instruments developed by HRI, and to report findings to the core evaluation on a regular basis. This case study describes the relationship between project-level involvement in the LSC core evaluation and the use of the core evaluation by project leaders and evaluators.",
author = "Kelli Johnson and Weiss, {Iris R.}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ev.350",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "129",
pages = "17--23",
journal = "New Directions for Evaluation",
issn = "1097-6736",
publisher = "Jossey-Bass Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Compulsory project-level involvement and the use of program-level evaluations

T2 - Evaluating the local systemic change for teacher enhancement program

AU - Johnson, Kelli

AU - Weiss, Iris R.

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) contracted with principal investigator Iris Weiss and an evaluation team at Horizon Research, Inc. (HRI) to conduct a national evaluation of the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program (LSC). HRI conducted the core evaluation under a $6.25 million contract with NSF. This program evaluation project, called the LSC core evaluation, had an overarching program-wide focus that included all 88 local LSC projects. The LSC core evaluation was a large, multisite program evaluation that included multiple data-collection and information-dissemination activities. Each local LSC project was required to have a project-level evaluator, to collect information by using predesigned data-collection instruments developed by HRI, and to report findings to the core evaluation on a regular basis. This case study describes the relationship between project-level involvement in the LSC core evaluation and the use of the core evaluation by project leaders and evaluators.

AB - In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) contracted with principal investigator Iris Weiss and an evaluation team at Horizon Research, Inc. (HRI) to conduct a national evaluation of the Local Systemic Change for Teacher Enhancement program (LSC). HRI conducted the core evaluation under a $6.25 million contract with NSF. This program evaluation project, called the LSC core evaluation, had an overarching program-wide focus that included all 88 local LSC projects. The LSC core evaluation was a large, multisite program evaluation that included multiple data-collection and information-dissemination activities. Each local LSC project was required to have a project-level evaluator, to collect information by using predesigned data-collection instruments developed by HRI, and to report findings to the core evaluation on a regular basis. This case study describes the relationship between project-level involvement in the LSC core evaluation and the use of the core evaluation by project leaders and evaluators.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82455250764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82455250764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ev.350

DO - 10.1002/ev.350

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:82455250764

VL - 129

SP - 17

EP - 23

JO - New Directions for Evaluation

JF - New Directions for Evaluation

SN - 1097-6736

IS - 1

ER -