Compressive sampling vs. conventional imaging

Jarvis Haupt, Robert Nowak

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Compressive sampling (CS), or "Compressed Sensing," has recently generated a tremendous amount of excitement in the image processing community. CS involves taking a relatively small number of non-traditional samples in the form of randomized projections that are capable of capturing the most salient information in an image. If the image being sampled is compressible in a certain basis (e.g., wavelet), then under noiseless conditions the image can be much more accurately recovered from random projections than from pixel samples. However, the performance of CS can degrade markedly in the presence of noise. In this paper, we compare CS to conventional imaging by considering a canonical class of piecewise smooth image models. Our conclusion is that CS can be advantageous in noisy imaging problems if the underlying image is highly compressible or if the SNR is sufficiently large.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication2006 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2006 - Proceedings
Pages1269-1272
Number of pages4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006
Event2006 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2006 - Atlanta, GA, United States
Duration: Oct 8 2006Oct 11 2006

Publication series

NameProceedings - International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP
ISSN (Print)1522-4880

Other

Other2006 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2006
CountryUnited States
CityAtlanta, GA
Period10/8/0610/11/06

Keywords

  • Image sampling
  • Random projections

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Compressive sampling vs. conventional imaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this