TY - GEN
T1 - Compositional verification of a medical device system
AU - Murugesan, Anitha
AU - Whalen, Michael W.
AU - Rayadurgam, Sanjai
AU - Heimdahl, Mats P.E.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Complex systems are by necessity hierarchically organized. Decomposition into subsystems allows for intellectual control, as well as enabling different subsystems to be created by distinct teams. This decomposition affects both requirements and architecture. The architecture describes the structure and this affects how requirements '"flow down" to each subsystem. Moreover, discoveries in the design process may affect the requirements. Demonstrating that a complex system satisfies its requirements when the subsystems are composed is a challenging problem. In this paper, we present a medical device case example where we apply an iterative approach to architecture and verification based on software architectural models. We represent the hierarchical composition of the system in the Architecture Analysis and Design Language (AADL), and use an extension to the AADL language to describe the requirements at different levels of abstraction for compositional verification. The component-level behavior for the model is described in Simulink/Stateflow. We assemble proofs of system level properties by using the Simulink Design Verifier to establish component-level properties and an open-source plug-in for the OSATE AADL environment to perform the compositional verification of the architecture. This combination of verification tools allows us to iteratively explore design and verification of detailed behavioral models, and to scale formal analysis to large software systems.
AB - Complex systems are by necessity hierarchically organized. Decomposition into subsystems allows for intellectual control, as well as enabling different subsystems to be created by distinct teams. This decomposition affects both requirements and architecture. The architecture describes the structure and this affects how requirements '"flow down" to each subsystem. Moreover, discoveries in the design process may affect the requirements. Demonstrating that a complex system satisfies its requirements when the subsystems are composed is a challenging problem. In this paper, we present a medical device case example where we apply an iterative approach to architecture and verification based on software architectural models. We represent the hierarchical composition of the system in the Architecture Analysis and Design Language (AADL), and use an extension to the AADL language to describe the requirements at different levels of abstraction for compositional verification. The component-level behavior for the model is described in Simulink/Stateflow. We assemble proofs of system level properties by using the Simulink Design Verifier to establish component-level properties and an open-source plug-in for the OSATE AADL environment to perform the compositional verification of the architecture. This combination of verification tools allows us to iteratively explore design and verification of detailed behavioral models, and to scale formal analysis to large software systems.
KW - compositional verification
KW - cyber physical systems
KW - system decomposition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889570896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889570896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/2527269.2527272
DO - 10.1145/2527269.2527272
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84889570896
SN - 9781450324670
T3 - HILT 2013 - Proceedings of the ACM Conference on High Integrity Language Technology
SP - 51
EP - 64
BT - HILT 2013 - Proceedings of the ACM Conference on High Integrity Language Technology
T2 - 2013 ACM SIGAda Annual International Conference on High Integrity Language Technology, HILT 2013
Y2 - 10 November 2013 through 14 November 2013
ER -