Composition or Context: Using Transportability to Understand Drivers of Site Differences in a Large-scale Housing Experiment

Kara E. Rudolph, Nicole M Schmidt, M. Maria Glymour, Rebecca Crowder, Jessica Galin, Jennifer Ahern, Theresa L Osypuk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Moving To Opportunity (MTO) experiment manipulated neighborhood context by randomly assigning housing vouchers to volunteers living in public housing to use to move to lower poverty neighborhoods in five US cities. This random assignment overcomes confounding limitations that challenge other neighborhood studies. However, differences in MTO's effects across the five cities have been largely ignored. Such differences could be due to population composition (e.g., differences in the racial/ethnic distribution) or to context (e.g., differences in the economy). Methods: Using a nonparametric omnibus test and a multiply robust, semiparametric estimator for transportability, we assessed the extent to which differences in individual-level compositional characteristics that may act as effect modifiers can account for differences in MTO's effects across sites. We examined MTO's effects on marijuana use, behavioral problems, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder among black and Latino adolescent males, where housing voucher receipt was harmful for health in some sites but beneficial in others. Results: Comparing point estimates, differences in composition partially explained site differences in MTO effects on marijuana use and behavioral problems but did not explain site differences for major depressive disorder or generalized anxiety disorder. Conclusions: Our findings provide quantitative, rigorous evidence for the importance of context or unmeasured individual-level compositional variables in modifying MTO's effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-206
Number of pages8
JournalEpidemiology
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Major Depressive Disorder
Cannabis
Anxiety Disorders
Public Housing
Poverty
Hispanic Americans
Individuality
Volunteers
Health
Population
Problem Behavior

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Cite this

Composition or Context : Using Transportability to Understand Drivers of Site Differences in a Large-scale Housing Experiment. / Rudolph, Kara E.; Schmidt, Nicole M; Glymour, M. Maria; Crowder, Rebecca; Galin, Jessica; Ahern, Jennifer; Osypuk, Theresa L.

In: Epidemiology, Vol. 29, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 199-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rudolph, Kara E. ; Schmidt, Nicole M ; Glymour, M. Maria ; Crowder, Rebecca ; Galin, Jessica ; Ahern, Jennifer ; Osypuk, Theresa L. / Composition or Context : Using Transportability to Understand Drivers of Site Differences in a Large-scale Housing Experiment. In: Epidemiology. 2018 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 199-206.
@article{6298b645d6284dfc8c7d5590c8b64549,
title = "Composition or Context: Using Transportability to Understand Drivers of Site Differences in a Large-scale Housing Experiment",
abstract = "Background: The Moving To Opportunity (MTO) experiment manipulated neighborhood context by randomly assigning housing vouchers to volunteers living in public housing to use to move to lower poverty neighborhoods in five US cities. This random assignment overcomes confounding limitations that challenge other neighborhood studies. However, differences in MTO's effects across the five cities have been largely ignored. Such differences could be due to population composition (e.g., differences in the racial/ethnic distribution) or to context (e.g., differences in the economy). Methods: Using a nonparametric omnibus test and a multiply robust, semiparametric estimator for transportability, we assessed the extent to which differences in individual-level compositional characteristics that may act as effect modifiers can account for differences in MTO's effects across sites. We examined MTO's effects on marijuana use, behavioral problems, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder among black and Latino adolescent males, where housing voucher receipt was harmful for health in some sites but beneficial in others. Results: Comparing point estimates, differences in composition partially explained site differences in MTO effects on marijuana use and behavioral problems but did not explain site differences for major depressive disorder or generalized anxiety disorder. Conclusions: Our findings provide quantitative, rigorous evidence for the importance of context or unmeasured individual-level compositional variables in modifying MTO's effects.",
author = "Rudolph, {Kara E.} and Schmidt, {Nicole M} and Glymour, {M. Maria} and Rebecca Crowder and Jessica Galin and Jennifer Ahern and Osypuk, {Theresa L}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/EDE.0000000000000774",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "199--206",
journal = "Epidemiology",
issn = "1044-3983",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Composition or Context

T2 - Using Transportability to Understand Drivers of Site Differences in a Large-scale Housing Experiment

AU - Rudolph, Kara E.

AU - Schmidt, Nicole M

AU - Glymour, M. Maria

AU - Crowder, Rebecca

AU - Galin, Jessica

AU - Ahern, Jennifer

AU - Osypuk, Theresa L

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Background: The Moving To Opportunity (MTO) experiment manipulated neighborhood context by randomly assigning housing vouchers to volunteers living in public housing to use to move to lower poverty neighborhoods in five US cities. This random assignment overcomes confounding limitations that challenge other neighborhood studies. However, differences in MTO's effects across the five cities have been largely ignored. Such differences could be due to population composition (e.g., differences in the racial/ethnic distribution) or to context (e.g., differences in the economy). Methods: Using a nonparametric omnibus test and a multiply robust, semiparametric estimator for transportability, we assessed the extent to which differences in individual-level compositional characteristics that may act as effect modifiers can account for differences in MTO's effects across sites. We examined MTO's effects on marijuana use, behavioral problems, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder among black and Latino adolescent males, where housing voucher receipt was harmful for health in some sites but beneficial in others. Results: Comparing point estimates, differences in composition partially explained site differences in MTO effects on marijuana use and behavioral problems but did not explain site differences for major depressive disorder or generalized anxiety disorder. Conclusions: Our findings provide quantitative, rigorous evidence for the importance of context or unmeasured individual-level compositional variables in modifying MTO's effects.

AB - Background: The Moving To Opportunity (MTO) experiment manipulated neighborhood context by randomly assigning housing vouchers to volunteers living in public housing to use to move to lower poverty neighborhoods in five US cities. This random assignment overcomes confounding limitations that challenge other neighborhood studies. However, differences in MTO's effects across the five cities have been largely ignored. Such differences could be due to population composition (e.g., differences in the racial/ethnic distribution) or to context (e.g., differences in the economy). Methods: Using a nonparametric omnibus test and a multiply robust, semiparametric estimator for transportability, we assessed the extent to which differences in individual-level compositional characteristics that may act as effect modifiers can account for differences in MTO's effects across sites. We examined MTO's effects on marijuana use, behavioral problems, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder among black and Latino adolescent males, where housing voucher receipt was harmful for health in some sites but beneficial in others. Results: Comparing point estimates, differences in composition partially explained site differences in MTO effects on marijuana use and behavioral problems but did not explain site differences for major depressive disorder or generalized anxiety disorder. Conclusions: Our findings provide quantitative, rigorous evidence for the importance of context or unmeasured individual-level compositional variables in modifying MTO's effects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048382605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048382605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000774

DO - 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000774

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 199

EP - 206

JO - Epidemiology

JF - Epidemiology

SN - 1044-3983

IS - 2

ER -