Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Composition dependence of ion heating in dayside magnetopause reconnection: MMS observations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Motivated by observed composition dependence in reconnection energy outflow and by theoretical and simulation studies predicting differences between heating of H+ and heavier ions, we investigated the ion composition dependence of heating associated with reconnection in 28 dayside magnetopause crossings in Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) data. Methods: We applied Least Squares fitting to analyze the relationship of temperature change across the magnetopause exhaust to available magnetic energy. Available magnetic energy per ion-electron pair flowing into the magnetopause from the magnetosheath and magnetosphere ranged between a few tens of eV and ∼1750 eV. Results: The individual fits for composition-nonspecific ions and for H+ were significantly lower than the empirical scaling relationship found previously between the temperature change and the inflowing magnetic energy; the fit for He++ was higher, with marginal significance. A composite data product combining H+ and He++ agreed with the empirical scaling relationship to within 95%. Discussion: Although comparisons between heating of H+ and He++ are suggestive of enhanced heating of heavy ions, differences could not be identified conclusively due to high scatter and a small number of events with adequate densities of heavy ions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1749271
JournalFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
Volume12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2026 Hanson, Balboa, Corona, Cattell, Tyler, Phan, Fuselier and Gomez.

Keywords

  • dayside magnetopause
  • heavy ions
  • ion composition
  • ion heating
  • magnetic reconnection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Composition dependence of ion heating in dayside magnetopause reconnection: MMS observations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this