TY - JOUR
T1 - Compliance with the national SEP-1 quality measure and association with sepsis outcomes
T2 - A multicenter retrospective cohort study
AU - Rhee, Chanu
AU - Filbin, Michael R.
AU - Massaro, Anthony F.
AU - Bulger, Amy L.
AU - McEachern, Donna
AU - Tobin, Kathleen A.
AU - Kitch, Barrett T.
AU - Thurlo-Walsh, Bert
AU - Kadar, Aran
AU - Koffman, Alexandra
AU - Pande, Anupam
AU - Hamad, Yasir
AU - Warren, David K.
AU - Jones, Travis M.
AU - O'Brien, Cara
AU - Anderson, Deverick J.
AU - Wang, Rui
AU - Klompas, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Objectives: Many septic patients receive care that fails the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' SEP-1 measure, but it is unclear whether this refects meaningful lapses in care, differences in clinical characteristics, or excessive rigidity of the "all-or-nothing" measure. We compared outcomes in cases that passed versus failed SEP-1 during the first 2 years after the measure was implemented. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Seven U.S. hospitals. Patients: Adult patients included in SEP-1 reporting between October 2015 and September 2017. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Of 851 sepsis cases in the cohort, 281 (33%) passed SEP-1 and 570 (67%) failed. SEP-1 failures had higher rates of septic shock (20% vs 9%; p < 0.001), hospital-onset sepsis (11% vs 4%; p = 0.001), and vague presenting symptoms (46% vs 30%; p < 0.001). The most common reasons for failure were omission of 3- and 6-hour lactate measurements (228/570 failures, 40%). Only 86 of 570 failures (15.1%) had greater than 3-hour delays until broad-spectrum antibiotics. Cases that failed SEP-1 had higher in-hospital mortality rates (18.4% vs 11.0%; odds ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.19-2.80; p = 0.006), but this association was no longer significant after adjusting for differences in clinical characteristics and severity of illness (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.85-2.18; p = 0.205). Delays of greater than 3 hours until antibiotics were significantly associated with death (adjusted odds ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.04-3.62; p = 0.038), whereas failing SEP-1 for any other reason was not (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.70-1.72; p = 0.674). Conclusions: Crude mortality rates were higher in sepsis cases that failed versus passed SEP-1, but there was no difference after adjusting for clinical characteristics and severity of illness. Delays in antibiotic administration were associated with higher mortality but only accounted for a small fraction of SEP-1 failures. SEP-1 may not clearly differentiate between high- and low-quality care, and detailed risk adjustment is necessary to properly interpret associations between SEP-1 compliance and mortality.
AB - Objectives: Many septic patients receive care that fails the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' SEP-1 measure, but it is unclear whether this refects meaningful lapses in care, differences in clinical characteristics, or excessive rigidity of the "all-or-nothing" measure. We compared outcomes in cases that passed versus failed SEP-1 during the first 2 years after the measure was implemented. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Seven U.S. hospitals. Patients: Adult patients included in SEP-1 reporting between October 2015 and September 2017. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Of 851 sepsis cases in the cohort, 281 (33%) passed SEP-1 and 570 (67%) failed. SEP-1 failures had higher rates of septic shock (20% vs 9%; p < 0.001), hospital-onset sepsis (11% vs 4%; p = 0.001), and vague presenting symptoms (46% vs 30%; p < 0.001). The most common reasons for failure were omission of 3- and 6-hour lactate measurements (228/570 failures, 40%). Only 86 of 570 failures (15.1%) had greater than 3-hour delays until broad-spectrum antibiotics. Cases that failed SEP-1 had higher in-hospital mortality rates (18.4% vs 11.0%; odds ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.19-2.80; p = 0.006), but this association was no longer significant after adjusting for differences in clinical characteristics and severity of illness (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.85-2.18; p = 0.205). Delays of greater than 3 hours until antibiotics were significantly associated with death (adjusted odds ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.04-3.62; p = 0.038), whereas failing SEP-1 for any other reason was not (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.70-1.72; p = 0.674). Conclusions: Crude mortality rates were higher in sepsis cases that failed versus passed SEP-1, but there was no difference after adjusting for clinical characteristics and severity of illness. Delays in antibiotic administration were associated with higher mortality but only accounted for a small fraction of SEP-1 failures. SEP-1 may not clearly differentiate between high- and low-quality care, and detailed risk adjustment is necessary to properly interpret associations between SEP-1 compliance and mortality.
KW - Quality measures
KW - SEP-1
KW - Sepsis
KW - Sepsis bundles
KW - Septic shock
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058689003&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058689003&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003261
DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003261
M3 - Article
C2 - 30015667
AN - SCOPUS:85058689003
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 46
SP - 1585
EP - 1591
JO - Critical care medicine
JF - Critical care medicine
IS - 10
ER -