Competitive effects of cultivar and wild switchgrass on other native grasses

James O. Eckberg; Gregg A. Johnson; Laura L. Seefeldt; Andrew J. Felton; Michael D. Casler; Ruth G. Shaw

doi:10.1007/s10530-018-1711-6

Competitive effects of cultivar and wild switchgrass on other native grasses

James O. Eckberg, Gregg A. Johnson, Laura L. Seefeldt, Andrew J. Felton, Michael D. Casler, Ruth G. Shaw

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

There is mounting concern that selection and breeding of native grasses for greater biomass production could promote weediness. Yet little is known about the invasion potential or ecological impacts of such selectively bred native grasses. Here we focus on cultivars of native switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) that have undergone selection, breeding, and intraspecific hybridization to improve agronomic traits for biomass production. We evaluated the competitive effects of switchgrass cultivars (EG-2101 and ‘Trailblazer’) and wild switchgrass populations on two native prairie grasses [sideoats grama, Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr., and Canada wild rye, Elymus canadensis L.] across a gradient of switchgrass density in a greenhouse. Cultivars produced 48–128% more biomass and reduced sideoats grama biomass by 25–59% more than wild switchgrass. Effects of switchgrass cultivars on Canada wild rye were minimal compared to sideoats grama. Later flowering and larger seed size of cultivars may be contributing to their greater biomass and competitive effects on sideoats grama. These data suggest that breeding switchgrass for enhanced biomass yield may increase competitive effects on some native grasses. Further studies are merited to test the potential for switchgrass biomass cultivars to spread and impact species diversity of restored and remnant native plant communities.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	2439-2449
Number of pages	11
Journal	Biological Invasions
Volume	20
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1711-6
State	Published - Sep 1 2018

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors thank University of Minnesota staff Kevin Betts, Roger Meissner, Rachel Pain, and Pamela Warnke for assistance and support in conducting the experiment; Matt Bickell for GIS support; Ellen Fuge (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) and Meredith Cornett (The Nature Conservancy) for providing data from the Minnesota County Biological Survey as well as issuing the seed collection permit (2011-37R); and Brad Bolduan, Mark Cleveland, Larissa Mottl, and Russell Smith (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) and Matt Graeve (The Nature Conservancy) for providing information on the management history of Scientific and Natural Areas. This project was funded by the University of Minnesota Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP) and the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund.

Funding Information:
Acknowledgements The authors thank University of Minnesota staff Kevin Betts, Roger Meissner, Rachel Pain, and Pamela Warnke for assistance and support in conducting the experiment; Matt Bickell for GIS support; Ellen Fuge (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) and Meredith Cornett (The Nature Conservancy) for providing data from the Minnesota County Biological Survey as well as issuing the seed collection permit (2011-37R); and Brad Bolduan, Mark Cleveland, Larissa Mottl, and Russell Smith (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) and Matt Graeve (The Nature Conservancy) for providing information on the management history of Scientific and Natural Areas. This project was funded by the University of Minnesota Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP) and the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords

Biofuel
Heterospecific
Interspecific
Invasion
Invasiveness

Publisher link

10.1007/s10530-018-1711-6

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{5012a771911a4e65a65a95ee4c661236,

title = "Competitive effects of cultivar and wild switchgrass on other native grasses",

abstract = "There is mounting concern that selection and breeding of native grasses for greater biomass production could promote weediness. Yet little is known about the invasion potential or ecological impacts of such selectively bred native grasses. Here we focus on cultivars of native switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) that have undergone selection, breeding, and intraspecific hybridization to improve agronomic traits for biomass production. We evaluated the competitive effects of switchgrass cultivars (EG-2101 and {\textquoteleft}Trailblazer{\textquoteright}) and wild switchgrass populations on two native prairie grasses [sideoats grama, Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr., and Canada wild rye, Elymus canadensis L.] across a gradient of switchgrass density in a greenhouse. Cultivars produced 48–128% more biomass and reduced sideoats grama biomass by 25–59% more than wild switchgrass. Effects of switchgrass cultivars on Canada wild rye were minimal compared to sideoats grama. Later flowering and larger seed size of cultivars may be contributing to their greater biomass and competitive effects on sideoats grama. These data suggest that breeding switchgrass for enhanced biomass yield may increase competitive effects on some native grasses. Further studies are merited to test the potential for switchgrass biomass cultivars to spread and impact species diversity of restored and remnant native plant communities.",

keywords = "Biofuel, Heterospecific, Interspecific, Invasion, Invasiveness",

author = "Eckberg, {James O.} and Johnson, {Gregg A.} and Seefeldt, {Laura L.} and Felton, {Andrew J.} and Casler, {Michael D.} and Shaw, {Ruth G.}",

note = "Funding Information: The authors thank University of Minnesota staff Kevin Betts, Roger Meissner, Rachel Pain, and Pamela Warnke for assistance and support in conducting the experiment; Matt Bickell for GIS support; Ellen Fuge (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) and Meredith Cornett (The Nature Conservancy) for providing data from the Minnesota County Biological Survey as well as issuing the seed collection permit (2011-37R); and Brad Bolduan, Mark Cleveland, Larissa Mottl, and Russell Smith (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) and Matt Graeve (The Nature Conservancy) for providing information on the management history of Scientific and Natural Areas. This project was funded by the University of Minnesota Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP) and the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund. Funding Information: Acknowledgements The authors thank University of Minnesota staff Kevin Betts, Roger Meissner, Rachel Pain, and Pamela Warnke for assistance and support in conducting the experiment; Matt Bickell for GIS support; Ellen Fuge (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) and Meredith Cornett (The Nature Conservancy) for providing data from the Minnesota County Biological Survey as well as issuing the seed collection permit (2011-37R); and Brad Bolduan, Mark Cleveland, Larissa Mottl, and Russell Smith (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) and Matt Graeve (The Nature Conservancy) for providing information on the management history of Scientific and Natural Areas. This project was funded by the University of Minnesota Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP) and the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature.",

year = "2018",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s10530-018-1711-6",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "20",

pages = "2439--2449",

journal = "Biological Invasions",

issn = "1387-3547",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competitive effects of cultivar and wild switchgrass on other native grasses

AU - Eckberg, James O.

AU - Johnson, Gregg A.

AU - Seefeldt, Laura L.

AU - Felton, Andrew J.

AU - Casler, Michael D.

AU - Shaw, Ruth G.

N1 - Funding Information: The authors thank University of Minnesota staff Kevin Betts, Roger Meissner, Rachel Pain, and Pamela Warnke for assistance and support in conducting the experiment; Matt Bickell for GIS support; Ellen Fuge (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) and Meredith Cornett (The Nature Conservancy) for providing data from the Minnesota County Biological Survey as well as issuing the seed collection permit (2011-37R); and Brad Bolduan, Mark Cleveland, Larissa Mottl, and Russell Smith (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) and Matt Graeve (The Nature Conservancy) for providing information on the management history of Scientific and Natural Areas. This project was funded by the University of Minnesota Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP) and the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund. Funding Information: Acknowledgements The authors thank University of Minnesota staff Kevin Betts, Roger Meissner, Rachel Pain, and Pamela Warnke for assistance and support in conducting the experiment; Matt Bickell for GIS support; Ellen Fuge (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) and Meredith Cornett (The Nature Conservancy) for providing data from the Minnesota County Biological Survey as well as issuing the seed collection permit (2011-37R); and Brad Bolduan, Mark Cleveland, Larissa Mottl, and Russell Smith (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) and Matt Graeve (The Nature Conservancy) for providing information on the management history of Scientific and Natural Areas. This project was funded by the University of Minnesota Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP) and the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund. Publisher Copyright: © 2018, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - There is mounting concern that selection and breeding of native grasses for greater biomass production could promote weediness. Yet little is known about the invasion potential or ecological impacts of such selectively bred native grasses. Here we focus on cultivars of native switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) that have undergone selection, breeding, and intraspecific hybridization to improve agronomic traits for biomass production. We evaluated the competitive effects of switchgrass cultivars (EG-2101 and ‘Trailblazer’) and wild switchgrass populations on two native prairie grasses [sideoats grama, Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr., and Canada wild rye, Elymus canadensis L.] across a gradient of switchgrass density in a greenhouse. Cultivars produced 48–128% more biomass and reduced sideoats grama biomass by 25–59% more than wild switchgrass. Effects of switchgrass cultivars on Canada wild rye were minimal compared to sideoats grama. Later flowering and larger seed size of cultivars may be contributing to their greater biomass and competitive effects on sideoats grama. These data suggest that breeding switchgrass for enhanced biomass yield may increase competitive effects on some native grasses. Further studies are merited to test the potential for switchgrass biomass cultivars to spread and impact species diversity of restored and remnant native plant communities.

AB - There is mounting concern that selection and breeding of native grasses for greater biomass production could promote weediness. Yet little is known about the invasion potential or ecological impacts of such selectively bred native grasses. Here we focus on cultivars of native switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) that have undergone selection, breeding, and intraspecific hybridization to improve agronomic traits for biomass production. We evaluated the competitive effects of switchgrass cultivars (EG-2101 and ‘Trailblazer’) and wild switchgrass populations on two native prairie grasses [sideoats grama, Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr., and Canada wild rye, Elymus canadensis L.] across a gradient of switchgrass density in a greenhouse. Cultivars produced 48–128% more biomass and reduced sideoats grama biomass by 25–59% more than wild switchgrass. Effects of switchgrass cultivars on Canada wild rye were minimal compared to sideoats grama. Later flowering and larger seed size of cultivars may be contributing to their greater biomass and competitive effects on sideoats grama. These data suggest that breeding switchgrass for enhanced biomass yield may increase competitive effects on some native grasses. Further studies are merited to test the potential for switchgrass biomass cultivars to spread and impact species diversity of restored and remnant native plant communities.

KW - Biofuel

KW - Heterospecific

KW - Interspecific

KW - Invasion

KW - Invasiveness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044367689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044367689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10530-018-1711-6

DO - 10.1007/s10530-018-1711-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044367689

SN - 1387-3547

VL - 20

SP - 2439

EP - 2449

JO - Biological Invasions

JF - Biological Invasions

IS - 9

ER -

Competitive effects of cultivar and wild switchgrass on other native grasses

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this