Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of ventricular arrhythmia frequency in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy versus nonischemic cardiomyopathy treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

  • Cengiz Ermis
  • , Alan X. Zhu
  • , Laura Vanheel
  • , Mary Jo Lemke
  • , Scott Sakaguchi
  • , Keith G. Lurie
  • , Fei Lu
  • , Joseph Lin
  • , David G. Benditt

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators have been shown to provide similar survival benefits for patients who have left ventricular dysfunction due to ischemic heart disease and for subsets of patients who have nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Findings in this study extend these observations by showing that patients who have ischemic or nonischemic heart disease and receive implantable cardioverter defibrillators not only have comparable mortality rates but also similar tachyarrhythmia frequencies during follow-up; further, mortality and tachyarrhythmia outcomes are independent of initial arrhythmia indication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-238
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume96
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2005

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Dr. Ermis was supported in part by the Midwest Arrhythmia Research Foundation, Edina, Minnesota. Grant funding was received from the Midwest Arrhythmia Research Foundation, Edina, Minnesota, and from Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota. Dr. Lin was supported in part by an LRP grant from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of ventricular arrhythmia frequency in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy versus nonischemic cardiomyopathy treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this