TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Modified Radical Mastectomy
T2 - A Randomised Controlled Trial
AU - Ahuja, Deepti
AU - Kumar, Vinod
AU - Gupta, Nishkarsh
AU - Bharati, Sachidanand Jee
AU - Garg, Rakesh
AU - Mishra, Seema
AU - Khan, Maroof Ahmad
AU - Bhatnagar, Sushma
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Objective: Several interfascial interfacial plane blocks have been described in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. We conducted this study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. Methods: Totally, 80 female patients (18-70 years) undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomised into 2 groups of 40 each and were given ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block or erector spinae plane block with 0.4 mL kg−1 of 0.375% ropivacaine in this prospective double-blind control trial. The groups were compared for the time to request of first dose of rescue analgesic, requirement of rescue analgesics, and patient satisfaction score. Results: The time to request of the first rescue analgesia was comparable in both groups (P = .056). Postoperative pain scores at rest at 0 minute were significantly lower in serratus anterior plane group as compared to erector spinae plane group (P = .03). The intraoperative fentanyl requirement and postoperative diclofenac and tramadol requirements were comparable between the 2 groups. The number of patients requiring rescue doses of fentanyl intraoperatively and rescue analgesics postoperatively was similar in both groups. The mean patient satisfaction score was also comparable in both groups. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae plane block have comparable postoperative analgesic efficacy after modified radical mastectomy.
AB - Objective: Several interfascial interfacial plane blocks have been described in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. We conducted this study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. Methods: Totally, 80 female patients (18-70 years) undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomised into 2 groups of 40 each and were given ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block or erector spinae plane block with 0.4 mL kg−1 of 0.375% ropivacaine in this prospective double-blind control trial. The groups were compared for the time to request of first dose of rescue analgesic, requirement of rescue analgesics, and patient satisfaction score. Results: The time to request of the first rescue analgesia was comparable in both groups (P = .056). Postoperative pain scores at rest at 0 minute were significantly lower in serratus anterior plane group as compared to erector spinae plane group (P = .03). The intraoperative fentanyl requirement and postoperative diclofenac and tramadol requirements were comparable between the 2 groups. The number of patients requiring rescue doses of fentanyl intraoperatively and rescue analgesics postoperatively was similar in both groups. The mean patient satisfaction score was also comparable in both groups. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae plane block have comparable postoperative analgesic efficacy after modified radical mastectomy.
KW - Erector spinae plane block
KW - modified radical mastectomy
KW - pain
KW - regional anaesthesia
KW - serratus anterior plane block
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143770808&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85143770808&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5152/TJAR.2022.21127
DO - 10.5152/TJAR.2022.21127
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85143770808
SN - 2667-677X
VL - 50
SP - 435
EP - 442
JO - Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation
JF - Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation
IS - 6
ER -