TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of techniques used to support the nasal tip and their long-term effects on tip position
AU - Dobratz, Eric J.
AU - Tran, Vivian
AU - Hilger, Peter A.
PY - 2010/5
Y1 - 2010/5
N2 - Objectives: To examine the indications for the use of septal extension grafts, columellar struts, and tongueand-groove techniques to provide support and set the tip position during rhinoplasty, and to compare the strength of their support and analyze their long-term effects on tip position. Methods: The medical records and photographs of patients who underwent external septorhinoplasty during a 2-year period were analyzed. Forty patients had photographs from short-term follow-up (<12 weeks) and were included in the study. The short-term and longterm (>l52 weeks) tip positions were compared to determine the maintenance of tip position with each technique. Each stabilization technique was performed on 5 fresh cadavers, and the resistance to displacement of the tip was measured and compared. Results: Objective measurements in the cadaver analysis show increased resistance to tip displacement with the use of caudal septal extension grafts and tongue-andgroove techniques. There was no difference in the maintenance of tip position between the techniques in analysis of the patients who have undergone rhinoplasty. Conclusions: Many factors influence the maintenance of tip position in patients who have undergone rhinoplasty. One should consider using a stabilization technique to help resist displacement of the nasal tip. Clinical and operative findings, as well as secondary effects, are used to help determine which technique should be used.
AB - Objectives: To examine the indications for the use of septal extension grafts, columellar struts, and tongueand-groove techniques to provide support and set the tip position during rhinoplasty, and to compare the strength of their support and analyze their long-term effects on tip position. Methods: The medical records and photographs of patients who underwent external septorhinoplasty during a 2-year period were analyzed. Forty patients had photographs from short-term follow-up (<12 weeks) and were included in the study. The short-term and longterm (>l52 weeks) tip positions were compared to determine the maintenance of tip position with each technique. Each stabilization technique was performed on 5 fresh cadavers, and the resistance to displacement of the tip was measured and compared. Results: Objective measurements in the cadaver analysis show increased resistance to tip displacement with the use of caudal septal extension grafts and tongue-andgroove techniques. There was no difference in the maintenance of tip position between the techniques in analysis of the patients who have undergone rhinoplasty. Conclusions: Many factors influence the maintenance of tip position in patients who have undergone rhinoplasty. One should consider using a stabilization technique to help resist displacement of the nasal tip. Clinical and operative findings, as well as secondary effects, are used to help determine which technique should be used.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956626214&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956626214&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/archfacial.2010.33
DO - 10.1001/archfacial.2010.33
M3 - Article
C2 - 20479433
AN - SCOPUS:77956626214
SN - 1521-2491
VL - 12
SP - 172
EP - 179
JO - Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery
JF - Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery
IS - 3
ER -