Comparison of sulfate reduction rates in laboratory microcosms, field mesocosms, and in situ at little rock lake, wisconsin

Todd E. Perry, Lawrence A Baker, Patrick L. Brezonik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Model systems examine the effect of several treatments simultaneously, but how well do they simulate natural lake systems? In our studies at Little Rock Lake, Wis., we measured sediment–water fluxes of sulfate in laboratory sediment–water microcosms, in situ limnocorrals, and the whole lake. Treatments in the laboratory sediment–water microcosm experiment included sediment type, temperature, pH, and [SO42–]; sulfate fluxes were determined by mass balance. Treatments in the field mesocosms (4 m diameter × 1.5 m depth, open to sediment) included (in duplicate): control (pH 6.0), pH 5., 5.0, and 4.5 (H2SO4) and pH 5.0 (HCl). Weekly additions of acid maintained treatment pH throughout the summer. Results from these experimental systems are compared with sulfate fluxes measured in the lake (by porewater profiles and a whole-lake budget). Potential problems associated with experimental systems are discussed in the context of these experiments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-312
Number of pages4
JournalLake and Reservoir Management
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1986

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of sulfate reduction rates in laboratory microcosms, field mesocosms, and in situ at little rock lake, wisconsin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this