Comparison of sulfasalazine and placebo in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis

  • D. O. Clegg
  • , D. J. Reda
  • , E. Mejias
  • , G. W. Cannon
  • , M. H. Weisman
  • , T. Taylor
  • , E. Budiman-Mak
  • , W. D. Blackburn
  • , F. B. Vasey
  • , M. L. Mahowald
  • , J. J. Cush
  • , H. R. Schumacher
  • , S. L. Silverman
  • , F. P. Alepa
  • , M. E. Luggen
  • , M. R. Cohen
  • , R. Makkena
  • , C. M. Haakenson
  • , R. H. Ward
  • , B. J. Manaster
  • R. J. Anderson, J. R. Ward, W. G. Henderson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective. To determine whether sulfasalazine (SSZ) at a dosage of 2,000 mg/day is effective for the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) resistant to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug therapy. Methods. Two hundred twenty-one patients with PsA were recruited from 15 clinics, randomized (double-blind) to SSZ or placebo treatment, and followed up for 36 weeks. Treatment response was based on joint pain/ tenderness and swelling scores and physician and patient global assessments. Results. Longitudinal analysis revealed a trend favoring SSZ treatment (P = 0.13). At the end of treatment, response rates were 57.8% for SSZ compared with 44.6% for placebo (P = 0.05). The Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate declined more in the PsA patients taking SSZ than in those taking placebo (P < 0.0001). Adverse reactions were fewer than expected and were mainly due to nonspecific gastrointestinal complaints, including dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Conclusion. SSZ at a dosage of 2,000 mg/day is well tolerated and may be more effective than placebo in the treatment of patients with PsA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2013-2020
Number of pages8
JournalArthritis and rheumatism
Volume39
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1996

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of sulfasalazine and placebo in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this