Comparison of self-report and electronic monitoring of 6MP intake in childhood ALL: A Children’s Oncology Group study

Wendy Landier, Yanjun Chen, Lindsey Hageman, Heeyoung Kim, Bruce C. Bostrom, Jacqueline N. Casillas, David S. Dickens, William E. Evans, Kelly W. Maloney, Leo Mascarenhas, A. Kim Ritchey, Amanda M. Termuhlen, William L. Carroll, Mary V. Relling, F. Lennie Wong, Smita Bhatia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Adequate exposure to oral 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) during maintenance therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is critical for sustaining durable remissions; accuracy of self-reported 6MP intake is unknown. We aimed to directly compare self-report to electronic monitoring (Medication Event Monitoring System [MEMS]) and identify predictors of overreporting in a cohort of 416 children with ALL in first remission over 4 study months (1344 patient-months for the cohort) during maintenance therapy. Patients were classified as “perfect reporters” (self-report agreed with MEMS), “overreporters” (self-report was higher than MEMS by ‡5 days/month for ‡50% of study months), and “others” (not meeting criteria for perfect reporter or overreporter). Multivariable logistic regression examined sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, 6MP dose intensity, TPMT genotype, thioguanine nucleotide levels, and 6MP nonadherence (MEMS-based adherence <95%) associated with the overreporter phenotype; generalized estimating equations compared 6MP intake by self-report and MEMS. Self-reported 6MP intake exceeded MEMS at least some of the time in 84% of patients. Fifty patients (12%) were classified as perfect reporters, 98 (23.6%) as overreporters, 2 (0.5%) as underreporters, and 266 (63.9%) as others. In multivariable analysis, the following variables were associated with the overreporter phenotype: non-white race: Hispanic, odds ratio (OR), 2.4, P 5 .02; Asian, OR, 3.1, P 5 .02; African American, P < .001; paternal education less than college (OR, 1.4, P 5 .05); and 6MP nonadherence (OR, 9.4, P < .001). Self-report of 6MP intake in childhood ALL overestimates true intake, particularly in nonadherent patients, and should be used with caution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1919-1926
Number of pages8
JournalBlood
Volume129
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 6 2017

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was supported in part by the Children’s Oncology Group and National Institutes of Health grants from the National Cancer Institute (R01CA096670, U10CA098543, U10CA098413, U10CA095861, U10CA180886, U10CA180899, UG1CA189955, and P30CA21765) and National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P50GM115279).

Funding Information:
Contribution: S.B., W.L., and M.V.R. conceived and designed the study; S.B., W.L., L.H., B.C.B., J.N.C., D.S.D., K.W.M., L.M., A.K.R., A.M.T., and W.L.C. acquired the data; S.B., Y.C., F.L.W., W.L., H.K., W.E.E., and M.V.R. analyzed and interpreted the data; W.L., S.B., L.H., F.L.W., and Y.C. drafted the manuscript; S.B., W.L., Y.C., L.H., H.K., B.C.B., J.N.C., D.S.D., W.E.E., K.W.M., A.K.R., A.M.T., W.L.C., F.L.W., and M.V.R. revised the manuscript for important intellectual content; F.L.W., Y.C., H.K., W.L., and S.B. performed statistical analysis; S.B., W.L., L.H., and M.V.R. provided administrative, technical, or material support; and S.B., W.L., and L.H. supervised the study.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by The American Society of Hematology.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of self-report and electronic monitoring of 6MP intake in childhood ALL: A Children’s Oncology Group study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this