TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of peptidic and nonpeptidic δ-opioid agonists on guanosine 5′-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPγS) binding in brain slices from Sprague-Dawley rats
AU - Jutkiewicz, Emily M.
AU - Walker, Nicholas P.
AU - Folk, John E.
AU - Rice, Kenner C.
AU - Portoghese, Philip S.
AU - Woods, James H.
AU - Traynor, John R.
PY - 2005/3
Y1 - 2005/3
N2 - Previous studies have demonstrated that peptidic and nonpeptidic δ-opioid receptor agonists have different effects depending on the measure. For example, nonpeptidic δ-opioid agonists, but not peptidic agonists, produce convulsions in rats, and in vitro studies suggested that peptidic and nonpeptidic δ-opioid agonists might have differential mechanisms of receptor down-regulation. The present study evaluated potential differences between peptidic and nonpeptidic δ-opioid agonists in their ability to activate G proteins using guanosine 5′-O-(3-[ 35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPγS) autoradiography experiments in rat brain slices. The peptidic agonist [D-Pen2,D- Pen5]-enkephalin and the nonpeptidic agonist (+)BW373U86 [(+)-4-[α(R)-α-[(2S,5R)-2,5-dimethyl-4-(2-propenyl)-1-piperazinyl] -(3-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide] demonstrated concentration-dependent increases in [35S]GTPγS binding that were attenuated by the δ-opioid antagonist naltrindole. (+)BW373U86 was more potent and efficacious than the peptidic agonist, and this difference remained consistent across brain regions where significant stimulation was observed. In addition, multiple δ-opioid compounds were evaluated for their agonist activity in this assay. These data suggested that differences between peptidic and nonpeptidic δ-opioid agonists in behavioral studies were most likely caused by differences in agonist efficacy. Finally, these data also revealed that [35S]GTPγS autoradiography could be used to compare efficacy differences among agonists across various brain regions in rat brain slices.
AB - Previous studies have demonstrated that peptidic and nonpeptidic δ-opioid receptor agonists have different effects depending on the measure. For example, nonpeptidic δ-opioid agonists, but not peptidic agonists, produce convulsions in rats, and in vitro studies suggested that peptidic and nonpeptidic δ-opioid agonists might have differential mechanisms of receptor down-regulation. The present study evaluated potential differences between peptidic and nonpeptidic δ-opioid agonists in their ability to activate G proteins using guanosine 5′-O-(3-[ 35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPγS) autoradiography experiments in rat brain slices. The peptidic agonist [D-Pen2,D- Pen5]-enkephalin and the nonpeptidic agonist (+)BW373U86 [(+)-4-[α(R)-α-[(2S,5R)-2,5-dimethyl-4-(2-propenyl)-1-piperazinyl] -(3-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide] demonstrated concentration-dependent increases in [35S]GTPγS binding that were attenuated by the δ-opioid antagonist naltrindole. (+)BW373U86 was more potent and efficacious than the peptidic agonist, and this difference remained consistent across brain regions where significant stimulation was observed. In addition, multiple δ-opioid compounds were evaluated for their agonist activity in this assay. These data suggested that differences between peptidic and nonpeptidic δ-opioid agonists in behavioral studies were most likely caused by differences in agonist efficacy. Finally, these data also revealed that [35S]GTPγS autoradiography could be used to compare efficacy differences among agonists across various brain regions in rat brain slices.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14344251867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14344251867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1124/jpet.104.078741
DO - 10.1124/jpet.104.078741
M3 - Article
C2 - 15574687
AN - SCOPUS:14344251867
SN - 0022-3565
VL - 312
SP - 1314
EP - 1320
JO - Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
JF - Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
IS - 3
ER -