Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of Outpatient Mechanical Cervical Ripening Methods to Standard Inpatient Ripening

  • Mary P. Goering
  • , Whitney L. Wunderlich
  • , Marc C. Vacquier
  • , David A. Watson
  • , Kelly A. Drake
  • , Sandra I. Hoffman
  • , Anna Schulte
  • , Laura C. Colicchia
  • , Abbey C. Sidebottom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess clinical efficiency and maternal and neonatal outcomes for patients who underwent outpatient cervical ripening using mechanical methods (osmotic dilators and Foley balloon) compared with patients who underwent inpatient ripening. Study Design A retrospective cohort study from March 2020 to March 2022 compared patients with low-risk, term, singleton pregnancies who underwent outpatient cervical ripening to clinically similar patients who had inpatient ripening. Inverse probability of treatment weighting for analysis of outcomes to account for differences in groups and comparisons of outcomes are reported as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The cohort included 391 patients (116 outpatient, 275 inpatient). Among the outpatient group, half used only mechanical devices, and all others received additional pharmacological methods after admission for labor induction. Among the inpatient group, the most common cervical ripening method was pharmacological only (66.2%), followed by both pharmacological and mechanical (25.8%), and 8% used only mechanical. After outpatient cervical ripening, patients had significantly higher cervical dilation (mean difference 1.9 cm, 95% CI: 1.6, 2.3) and simplified bishop scores (mean difference 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2, 2.1) on admission compared with the inpatient group. The average time from admission to delivery was 5.8 hours shorter (95% CI: -8.6, -2.9) for the outpatient group compared with the inpatient group, and the average total length of stay was 7.1 hours shorter (95% CI: -12.1, -2.1) for the outpatients among patients with vaginal deliveries. Both groups had similar hours of oxytocin use, and mode of delivery, and did not differ for maternal complications or neonatal outcomes. Conclusion Outpatient cervical ripening using multiple mechanical methods was associated with significantly higher cervical dilation, shorter average time from patient admission to delivery, and shorter total length of stay for vaginal deliveries. Outpatient cervical ripening may be an important option for easing resource utilization for induced labor. Key Points Outpatient cervical ripening resulted in superior cervical dilation and Bishop scores. Hospital length of stay was shorter for those receiving outpatient cervical ripening. Maternal complications and neonatal outcomes did not differ by setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2013-2023
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Perinatology
Volume42
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2025
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Dilapan-S
  • Foley balloon
  • cervical ripening
  • induction
  • osmotic dilator
  • outpatient

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Comparative Study

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Outpatient Mechanical Cervical Ripening Methods to Standard Inpatient Ripening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this