Comparison of measures to screen for social, emotional, and behavioral risk

Faith G. Miller, Daniel Cohen, Sandra M. Chafouleas, T. Chris Riley-Tillman, Megan E. Welsh, Gregory A. Fabiano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relation between teacher-implemented screening measures used to identify social, emotional, and behavioral risk. To this end, 5 screening options were evaluated: (a) Direct Behavior Rating - Single Item Scales (DBRSIS), (b) Social Skills Improvement System - Performance Screening Guide (SSiS), (c) Behavioral and Emotional Screening System - Teacher Form (BESS), (d) Office discipline referrals (ODRs), and (e) School nomination methods. The sample included 1974 students who were assessed tri-annually by their teachers (52% female, 93% non-Hispanic, 81% white). Findings indicated that teacher ratings using standardized rating measures (DBRSIS, BESS, and SSiS) resulted in a larger proportion of students identified at-risk than ODRs or school nomination methods. Further, risk identification varied by screening option, such that a large percentage of students were inconsistently identified depending on the measure used. Results further indicated weak to strong correlations between screening options. The relation between broad behavioral indicators and mental health screening was also explored by examining classification accuracy indices. Teacher ratings using DBR-SIS and SSiS correctly identified between 81% and 91% of the sample as at-risk using the BESS as a criterion. As less conservative measures of risk, DBR-SIS and SSiS identified more students as at-risk relative to other options. Results highlight the importance of considering the aims of the assessment when selecting broad screening measures to identify students in need of additional support.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)184-196
Number of pages13
JournalSchool Psychology Quarterly
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Students
teacher rating
rating
teacher
student
Referral and Consultation
female teacher
school
Mental Health
mental health
performance

Keywords

  • Behavior
  • School mental health
  • Screening

Cite this

Miller, F. G., Cohen, D., Chafouleas, S. M., Chris Riley-Tillman, T., Welsh, M. E., & Fabiano, G. A. (2015). Comparison of measures to screen for social, emotional, and behavioral risk. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(2), 184-196. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000085

Comparison of measures to screen for social, emotional, and behavioral risk. / Miller, Faith G.; Cohen, Daniel; Chafouleas, Sandra M.; Chris Riley-Tillman, T.; Welsh, Megan E.; Fabiano, Gregory A.

In: School Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 2, 01.06.2015, p. 184-196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miller, FG, Cohen, D, Chafouleas, SM, Chris Riley-Tillman, T, Welsh, ME & Fabiano, GA 2015, 'Comparison of measures to screen for social, emotional, and behavioral risk', School Psychology Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 184-196. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000085
Miller FG, Cohen D, Chafouleas SM, Chris Riley-Tillman T, Welsh ME, Fabiano GA. Comparison of measures to screen for social, emotional, and behavioral risk. School Psychology Quarterly. 2015 Jun 1;30(2):184-196. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000085
Miller, Faith G. ; Cohen, Daniel ; Chafouleas, Sandra M. ; Chris Riley-Tillman, T. ; Welsh, Megan E. ; Fabiano, Gregory A. / Comparison of measures to screen for social, emotional, and behavioral risk. In: School Psychology Quarterly. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 184-196.
@article{2826fe697399408ba766c9ff6dc2ab96,
title = "Comparison of measures to screen for social, emotional, and behavioral risk",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to examine the relation between teacher-implemented screening measures used to identify social, emotional, and behavioral risk. To this end, 5 screening options were evaluated: (a) Direct Behavior Rating - Single Item Scales (DBRSIS), (b) Social Skills Improvement System - Performance Screening Guide (SSiS), (c) Behavioral and Emotional Screening System - Teacher Form (BESS), (d) Office discipline referrals (ODRs), and (e) School nomination methods. The sample included 1974 students who were assessed tri-annually by their teachers (52{\%} female, 93{\%} non-Hispanic, 81{\%} white). Findings indicated that teacher ratings using standardized rating measures (DBRSIS, BESS, and SSiS) resulted in a larger proportion of students identified at-risk than ODRs or school nomination methods. Further, risk identification varied by screening option, such that a large percentage of students were inconsistently identified depending on the measure used. Results further indicated weak to strong correlations between screening options. The relation between broad behavioral indicators and mental health screening was also explored by examining classification accuracy indices. Teacher ratings using DBR-SIS and SSiS correctly identified between 81{\%} and 91{\%} of the sample as at-risk using the BESS as a criterion. As less conservative measures of risk, DBR-SIS and SSiS identified more students as at-risk relative to other options. Results highlight the importance of considering the aims of the assessment when selecting broad screening measures to identify students in need of additional support.",
keywords = "Behavior, School mental health, Screening",
author = "Miller, {Faith G.} and Daniel Cohen and Chafouleas, {Sandra M.} and {Chris Riley-Tillman}, T. and Welsh, {Megan E.} and Fabiano, {Gregory A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/spq0000085",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "184--196",
journal = "School Psychology",
issn = "2578-4218",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of measures to screen for social, emotional, and behavioral risk

AU - Miller, Faith G.

AU - Cohen, Daniel

AU - Chafouleas, Sandra M.

AU - Chris Riley-Tillman, T.

AU - Welsh, Megan E.

AU - Fabiano, Gregory A.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to examine the relation between teacher-implemented screening measures used to identify social, emotional, and behavioral risk. To this end, 5 screening options were evaluated: (a) Direct Behavior Rating - Single Item Scales (DBRSIS), (b) Social Skills Improvement System - Performance Screening Guide (SSiS), (c) Behavioral and Emotional Screening System - Teacher Form (BESS), (d) Office discipline referrals (ODRs), and (e) School nomination methods. The sample included 1974 students who were assessed tri-annually by their teachers (52% female, 93% non-Hispanic, 81% white). Findings indicated that teacher ratings using standardized rating measures (DBRSIS, BESS, and SSiS) resulted in a larger proportion of students identified at-risk than ODRs or school nomination methods. Further, risk identification varied by screening option, such that a large percentage of students were inconsistently identified depending on the measure used. Results further indicated weak to strong correlations between screening options. The relation between broad behavioral indicators and mental health screening was also explored by examining classification accuracy indices. Teacher ratings using DBR-SIS and SSiS correctly identified between 81% and 91% of the sample as at-risk using the BESS as a criterion. As less conservative measures of risk, DBR-SIS and SSiS identified more students as at-risk relative to other options. Results highlight the importance of considering the aims of the assessment when selecting broad screening measures to identify students in need of additional support.

AB - The purpose of this study was to examine the relation between teacher-implemented screening measures used to identify social, emotional, and behavioral risk. To this end, 5 screening options were evaluated: (a) Direct Behavior Rating - Single Item Scales (DBRSIS), (b) Social Skills Improvement System - Performance Screening Guide (SSiS), (c) Behavioral and Emotional Screening System - Teacher Form (BESS), (d) Office discipline referrals (ODRs), and (e) School nomination methods. The sample included 1974 students who were assessed tri-annually by their teachers (52% female, 93% non-Hispanic, 81% white). Findings indicated that teacher ratings using standardized rating measures (DBRSIS, BESS, and SSiS) resulted in a larger proportion of students identified at-risk than ODRs or school nomination methods. Further, risk identification varied by screening option, such that a large percentage of students were inconsistently identified depending on the measure used. Results further indicated weak to strong correlations between screening options. The relation between broad behavioral indicators and mental health screening was also explored by examining classification accuracy indices. Teacher ratings using DBR-SIS and SSiS correctly identified between 81% and 91% of the sample as at-risk using the BESS as a criterion. As less conservative measures of risk, DBR-SIS and SSiS identified more students as at-risk relative to other options. Results highlight the importance of considering the aims of the assessment when selecting broad screening measures to identify students in need of additional support.

KW - Behavior

KW - School mental health

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930749512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930749512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/spq0000085

DO - 10.1037/spq0000085

M3 - Article

C2 - 25111469

AN - SCOPUS:84930749512

VL - 30

SP - 184

EP - 196

JO - School Psychology

JF - School Psychology

SN - 2578-4218

IS - 2

ER -