Comparison of five cell lines for the propagation of bovine viral diarrhea and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis viruses.

C. Onyekaba; J. Fahrmann; L. Bueon; P. King; S. M. Goyal

Comparison of five cell lines for the propagation of bovine viral diarrhea and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis viruses.

C. Onyekaba, J. Fahrmann, L. Bueon, P. King, S. M. Goyal

Veterinary Population Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

A comparative study was carried out to determine the susceptibility of 5 different cell types to bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) viruses. The cell systems used were swine testicle (ST), mink lung (ML), bovine turbinate (BT), porcine kidney (PK15) and equine dermal (ED) cells. For BVD virus, the titers obtained on day 8 post-infection were 10(1.13), 10(3.25), 10(4.13), 10(0.00) and 10(0.00), in ST, ML, BT, PK15 and ED cells, respectively. For the IBR virus, the titers obtained were 10(2.63), 10(8.5), 10(8.38), 10(3.00), and 10(4.63) in ST, ML, BT, PK15 and ED cells, respectively. This indicates, therefore, that BT and ML cells are optimal for the propagation of both BVD and IBR viruses and that ST, PK15, and ED cells are not very sensitive to these viruses.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	311-315
Number of pages	5
Journal	Microbiologica
Volume	10
Issue number	3
State	Published - Jul 1987

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{5ef2f01de4cc4b55abc5b199230cd381,

title = "Comparison of five cell lines for the propagation of bovine viral diarrhea and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis viruses.",

abstract = "A comparative study was carried out to determine the susceptibility of 5 different cell types to bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) viruses. The cell systems used were swine testicle (ST), mink lung (ML), bovine turbinate (BT), porcine kidney (PK15) and equine dermal (ED) cells. For BVD virus, the titers obtained on day 8 post-infection were 10(1.13), 10(3.25), 10(4.13), 10(0.00) and 10(0.00), in ST, ML, BT, PK15 and ED cells, respectively. For the IBR virus, the titers obtained were 10(2.63), 10(8.5), 10(8.38), 10(3.00), and 10(4.63) in ST, ML, BT, PK15 and ED cells, respectively. This indicates, therefore, that BT and ML cells are optimal for the propagation of both BVD and IBR viruses and that ST, PK15, and ED cells are not very sensitive to these viruses.",

author = "C. Onyekaba and J. Fahrmann and L. Bueon and P. King and Goyal, \{S. M.\}",

year = "1987",

month = jul,

language = "English (US)",

volume = "10",

pages = "311--315",

journal = "Microbiologica",

issn = "0391-5352",

publisher = "Luigi Ponzio e figlio Editori",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of five cell lines for the propagation of bovine viral diarrhea and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis viruses.

AU - Onyekaba, C.

AU - Fahrmann, J.

AU - Bueon, L.

AU - King, P.

AU - Goyal, S. M.

PY - 1987/7

Y1 - 1987/7

N2 - A comparative study was carried out to determine the susceptibility of 5 different cell types to bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) viruses. The cell systems used were swine testicle (ST), mink lung (ML), bovine turbinate (BT), porcine kidney (PK15) and equine dermal (ED) cells. For BVD virus, the titers obtained on day 8 post-infection were 10(1.13), 10(3.25), 10(4.13), 10(0.00) and 10(0.00), in ST, ML, BT, PK15 and ED cells, respectively. For the IBR virus, the titers obtained were 10(2.63), 10(8.5), 10(8.38), 10(3.00), and 10(4.63) in ST, ML, BT, PK15 and ED cells, respectively. This indicates, therefore, that BT and ML cells are optimal for the propagation of both BVD and IBR viruses and that ST, PK15, and ED cells are not very sensitive to these viruses.

AB - A comparative study was carried out to determine the susceptibility of 5 different cell types to bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) viruses. The cell systems used were swine testicle (ST), mink lung (ML), bovine turbinate (BT), porcine kidney (PK15) and equine dermal (ED) cells. For BVD virus, the titers obtained on day 8 post-infection were 10(1.13), 10(3.25), 10(4.13), 10(0.00) and 10(0.00), in ST, ML, BT, PK15 and ED cells, respectively. For the IBR virus, the titers obtained were 10(2.63), 10(8.5), 10(8.38), 10(3.00), and 10(4.63) in ST, ML, BT, PK15 and ED cells, respectively. This indicates, therefore, that BT and ML cells are optimal for the propagation of both BVD and IBR viruses and that ST, PK15, and ED cells are not very sensitive to these viruses.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0023371468

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023371468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3041184

AN - SCOPUS:0023371468

SN - 0391-5352

VL - 10

SP - 311

EP - 315

JO - Microbiologica

JF - Microbiologica

IS - 3

ER -

Comparison of five cell lines for the propagation of bovine viral diarrhea and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis viruses.

Abstract

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this