Comparison of epinephrine and vasopressin in a pediatric porcine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest

Wolfgang G. Voelckel, Keith G. Lurie, Scott McKnite, Todd Zielinski, Paul Lindstrom, Colleen Peterson, Anette C. Krismer, Karl H. Lindner, Volker Wenzel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

91 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to compare the effects of vasopressin vs. epinephrine vs. the combination of epinephrine with vasopressin on vital organ blood flow and return of spontaneous circulation in a pediatric porcine model of asphyxial arrest. Design: Prospective, randomized laboratory investigation using an established porcine model for measurement of hemodynamic variables, organ blood flow, blood gases, and return of spontaneous circulation. Setting: University hospital laboratory. Subjects: Eighteen piglets weighing 8-11 kg. Interventions: Asphyxial cardiac arrest was induced by clamping the endotracheal tube. After 8 mins of cardiac arrest and 8 mins of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, a bolus dose of either 0.8 units/kg vasopressin (n = 6), 200 μg/kg epinephrine (n = 6), or a combination of 45 μg/kg epinephrine with 0.8 units/kg vesopressin (n = 6) was administered in a randomized manner. Defibrillation was attempted 6 mins after drug administration. Measurements and Main Results: Mean ± SEM coronary perfusion pressure, before and 2 mins after drug administration, was 13 ± 2 and 23 ± 6 mm Hg in the vasopressin group; 14 ± 2 and 31 ± 4 mm Hg in the epinephrine group; and 13 ± 1 and 33 ± 6 mm Hg in the epinephrine-vasopressin group, respectively (p = NS). At the same time points, mean ± SEM left ventricular myocardial blood flow was 44 ± 31 and 44 ± 25 mL · min-1 · 100 g-1 in the vasopressin group; 30 ± 18 and 233 ± 61 mL · min-1 · 100 g-1 in the epinephrine group; and 36 ± 10 and 142 ± 57 mL · min-1 · 100 g-1 in the epinephrine-vasopressin group (p < .01 epinephrine vs. vasopressin; p < .02 epinephrine-vasopressin vs. vasopressin). Total cerebral blood flow trended toward higher values after epinephrine-vasopressin (60 ± 19 mL · min-1 · 100 g-1) than after vasopressin (36 ± 17 mL · min-1 · 100 g-1) or epinephrine alone (31 ± 7 mL · min-1 · 100 g-1; p = .07, respectively). One of six vasopressin, six of six epinephrine, and four of six epinephrine-vasopressin-treated animals had return of spontaneous circulation (p < .01, vasopressin vs. epinephrine). Conclusions: Administration of epinephrine, either alone or in combination with vasopressin, significantly improved left ventricular myocardial blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Return of spontaneous circulation was significantly more likely in epinephrine-treated pigs than in animals resuscitated with vasopressin alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3777-3783
Number of pages7
JournalCritical care medicine
Volume28
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Keywords

  • Asphyxia
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Coronary perfusion pressure
  • Epinephrine
  • Pediatrics
  • Postresuscitation phase
  • Regional blood flow
  • Return of spontaneous circulation
  • Vasopressin

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of epinephrine and vasopressin in a pediatric porcine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this