Abstract
Objective: We aimed to compare subjective assessment of image quality and rater agreement of magnetic resonance (MR) images of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) acquired with dental-dedicated 0.55 T and clinical 1.5 T magnetic field strengths. Study Design: Six blinded raters evaluated randomized TMJ MR images from 5 healthy participants imaged with 3 pulse sequences on 2 scanners: a 0.55 T system using a custom-built surface coil for dental-dedicated applications and a clinical 1.5 T system using a standard head/neck coil. TMJ anatomy and image quality parameters were assessed using a three-point scale (0 = unacceptable, 1 = acceptable, and 2 = excellent). Data was pooled across participants, pulse sequences, and sides. Kappa coefficients were calculated for intra- and inter-rater agreement. Chi-square tests were applied to explore differences between scanners. Significance was established at P<0.05. Results: Four different raters preferred 0.55 T images for visualizing hard and/or soft tissue anatomy (P≤.02). One rater preferred the 0.55 T system regarding contrast. No other differences were detected regarding qualitative ratings. Kappa values for intra-rater agreement ranged from 0.49 to 0.70 for 0.55 T images and 0.42 to 0.71 for 1.5 T images. Inter-rater kappa values ranged from 0.02 to 0.29 for 0.55 T images and 0.02 to 0.23 for 1.5 T images. Conclusions: Images from the two systems were rated similarly. Further research is needed to assess diagnostic performance in patients.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 113-124 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology |
| Volume | 140 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 Elsevier Inc.
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article
- Comparative Study
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of a 0.55 T dental-dedicated magnetic resonance imaging system with a 1.5 T system in evaluation of the temporomandibular joint regarding subjective image quality assessment and rater agreement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS