Comparing Wetland Elevation Change Using a Surface Elevation Table, Digital Level, and Total Station

James C. Lynch, Neil Winn, Katya Kovalenko, Glenn Guntenspergen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The surface elevation table (SET) approach and two survey instruments, a digital level (DL) and a total station (TS), were used to evaluate elevation change at a 1-ha, micro-tidal, back-barrier salt marsh at Assateague Island National Seashore (Berlin, MD, USA) from 2016 to 2022. SET data were collected at 3 sampling stations along the perimeter of the plot, 36 pins per station, and the DL and TS data were collected adjacent to 36 stakes, four readings per stake, throughout the plot. The average elevation range of the marsh surface measurements at the SET stations was 2 cm, while the range was considerably greater within the larger 1-ha DL and TS sampling area (24 cm). The average elevation of the marsh surface only varied by 2 cm among the three methods. Elevation change trends of the three methods ranged from 2.8 to 3.5 mm year−1 and were not significantly different from each other. Despite differences in sample size and spatial distribution of measurements, these methods provided comparable measures of long-term trends in marsh surface elevation probably because the marsh at this site was structurally homogeneous with low topographic relief.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2071-2079
Number of pages9
JournalEstuaries and Coasts
Volume47
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023.

Keywords

  • Barrier island (Assateague Island, MD)
  • Digital level
  • Elevation change
  • Salt marsh
  • Surface elevation table
  • Total station

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing Wetland Elevation Change Using a Surface Elevation Table, Digital Level, and Total Station'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this