Comparing retrospective and panel data collection methods to assess labor market dynamics

Ragui A Assaad, Caroline Krafft, Shaimaa Yassin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is potential for measurement problems in both retrospective and panel microdata. In this paper, we compare results on basic indicators related to labor markets and their dynamics from retrospective and panel survey data in Egypt, in order to determine the conditions under which results are similar or different. Specifically, we (1) assess the consistency of reporting of time-invariant characteristics in different waves of the panel, (2) compare the retrospective and panel data results on past labor market statuses, (3) assess the consistency of estimates of labor market transition rates across two specific dates by comparing panel and retrospective data, (4) assess the consistency of estimates of the level and trends of annual labor market transition rates across retrospective data from different waves of the survey, and (5) assess whether retrospective data can provide accurate trends of labor market aggregates, such as unemployment rates. We find that it is possible to garner useful information on labor market dynamics from retrospective data, but one must be cautious about which information to trust and at what level of detail. We conclude with a discussion of implications for future research as well as future survey design. JEL Classification: C83, C81, J01, J62, J64.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number17
JournalIZA Journal of Development and Migration
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

data collection method
panel data
labor market
market transition
survey design
unemployment rate
trend
unemployment
Egypt
method
Data collection
Labor market dynamics
Retrospective data
Panel data
Labour market
rate
Labour market transitions

Keywords

  • Egypt
  • Labor markets
  • Measurement error
  • Panel data
  • Retrospective data
  • Survey data

Cite this

Comparing retrospective and panel data collection methods to assess labor market dynamics. / Assaad, Ragui A; Krafft, Caroline; Yassin, Shaimaa.

In: IZA Journal of Development and Migration, Vol. 8, No. 1, 17, 01.12.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{885a58b150824440a3d86c689a8d75ff,
title = "Comparing retrospective and panel data collection methods to assess labor market dynamics",
abstract = "There is potential for measurement problems in both retrospective and panel microdata. In this paper, we compare results on basic indicators related to labor markets and their dynamics from retrospective and panel survey data in Egypt, in order to determine the conditions under which results are similar or different. Specifically, we (1) assess the consistency of reporting of time-invariant characteristics in different waves of the panel, (2) compare the retrospective and panel data results on past labor market statuses, (3) assess the consistency of estimates of labor market transition rates across two specific dates by comparing panel and retrospective data, (4) assess the consistency of estimates of the level and trends of annual labor market transition rates across retrospective data from different waves of the survey, and (5) assess whether retrospective data can provide accurate trends of labor market aggregates, such as unemployment rates. We find that it is possible to garner useful information on labor market dynamics from retrospective data, but one must be cautious about which information to trust and at what level of detail. We conclude with a discussion of implications for future research as well as future survey design. JEL Classification: C83, C81, J01, J62, J64.",
keywords = "Egypt, Labor markets, Measurement error, Panel data, Retrospective data, Survey data",
author = "Assaad, {Ragui A} and Caroline Krafft and Shaimaa Yassin",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s40176-018-0125-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "IZA Journal of Development and Migration",
issn = "2193-9020",
publisher = "Springer Open",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing retrospective and panel data collection methods to assess labor market dynamics

AU - Assaad, Ragui A

AU - Krafft, Caroline

AU - Yassin, Shaimaa

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - There is potential for measurement problems in both retrospective and panel microdata. In this paper, we compare results on basic indicators related to labor markets and their dynamics from retrospective and panel survey data in Egypt, in order to determine the conditions under which results are similar or different. Specifically, we (1) assess the consistency of reporting of time-invariant characteristics in different waves of the panel, (2) compare the retrospective and panel data results on past labor market statuses, (3) assess the consistency of estimates of labor market transition rates across two specific dates by comparing panel and retrospective data, (4) assess the consistency of estimates of the level and trends of annual labor market transition rates across retrospective data from different waves of the survey, and (5) assess whether retrospective data can provide accurate trends of labor market aggregates, such as unemployment rates. We find that it is possible to garner useful information on labor market dynamics from retrospective data, but one must be cautious about which information to trust and at what level of detail. We conclude with a discussion of implications for future research as well as future survey design. JEL Classification: C83, C81, J01, J62, J64.

AB - There is potential for measurement problems in both retrospective and panel microdata. In this paper, we compare results on basic indicators related to labor markets and their dynamics from retrospective and panel survey data in Egypt, in order to determine the conditions under which results are similar or different. Specifically, we (1) assess the consistency of reporting of time-invariant characteristics in different waves of the panel, (2) compare the retrospective and panel data results on past labor market statuses, (3) assess the consistency of estimates of labor market transition rates across two specific dates by comparing panel and retrospective data, (4) assess the consistency of estimates of the level and trends of annual labor market transition rates across retrospective data from different waves of the survey, and (5) assess whether retrospective data can provide accurate trends of labor market aggregates, such as unemployment rates. We find that it is possible to garner useful information on labor market dynamics from retrospective data, but one must be cautious about which information to trust and at what level of detail. We conclude with a discussion of implications for future research as well as future survey design. JEL Classification: C83, C81, J01, J62, J64.

KW - Egypt

KW - Labor markets

KW - Measurement error

KW - Panel data

KW - Retrospective data

KW - Survey data

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053212646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053212646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40176-018-0125-7

DO - 10.1186/s40176-018-0125-7

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - IZA Journal of Development and Migration

JF - IZA Journal of Development and Migration

SN - 2193-9020

IS - 1

M1 - 17

ER -