Abstract
The "combined-stimulation advantage" refers to an improvement in speech recognition when cochlear-implant or vocoded stimulation is supplemented by low-frequency acoustic information. Previous studies have been interpreted as evidence for "super-additive" or "synergistic" effects in the combination of low-frequency and electric or vocoded speech information by human listeners. However, this conclusion was based on predictions of performance obtained using a suboptimal high-threshold model of information combination. The present study shows that a different model, based on Gaussian signal detection theory, can predict surprisingly large combined-stimulation advantages, even when performance with either information source alone is close to chance, without involving any synergistic interaction. A reanalysis of published data using this model reveals that previous results, which have been interpreted as evidence for super-additive effects in perception of combined speech stimuli, are actually consistent with a more parsimonious explanation, according to which the combined-stimulation advantage reflects an optimal combination of two independent sources of information. The present results do not rule out the possible existence of synergistic effects in combined stimulation; however, they emphasize the possibility that the combined-stimulation advantages observed in some studies can be explained simply by non-interactive combination of two information sources.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3970-3980 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of the Acoustical Society of America |
Volume | 131 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2012 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by NIH R01 DC05216. The authors are grateful to Dr. R. P. Carlyon, Dr. L. Demany, Dr. Y. Y. Kong, and to one anonymous reviewer, for helpful suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2012 Acoustical Society of America.