Comparing measures of physician market concentration using tax identification numbers versus independent negotiating units

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Analysts interested in physician market concentration often have access to tax identification numbers (TINs), but not the number of truly independent negotiating units (NUs). Health plans do know the true number of NUs, and, using 2014 claims data for Minnesota physicians from a large midwestern health plan, we compare Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) measures of physician market concentration using TINs versus NUs at the county and metropolitan statistical area (MSA) levels for thirteen specialties. We found that HHIs computed using TINs versus NUs were similar across Minnesota. Two MSAs in Minnesota met the Department of Justice’s definition of highly concentrated markets. There is reason to believe that the discrepancy between TIN and NU HHIs may vary by insurance product and region of the country, and so we encourage other researchers to work with health plans to replicate our study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)128-135
Number of pages8
JournalAntitrust Bulletin
Volume64
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.

Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Consolidation
  • Markets
  • Physician

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing measures of physician market concentration using tax identification numbers versus independent negotiating units'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this