TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing ELISA test-positive prevalence, risk factors and management recommendations for Johne's disease prevention between organic and conventional dairy farms in Ontario, Canada
AU - Pieper, Laura
AU - Sorge, Ulrike S.
AU - DeVries, Trevor
AU - Godkin, Ann
AU - Lissemore, Kerry
AU - Kelton, David
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded through the University of Guelph-OMAF Research Partnership.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V..
Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/11/1
Y1 - 2015/11/1
N2 - Johne's disease (JD) is a chronic, infectious disease in cattle. Between 2010 and 2013, a voluntary JD control program was successfully launched in Ontario, Canada, including a Risk Assessment and Management Plan (RAMP) and JD ELISA testing of the entire milking herd. Over the last decade, the organic dairy sector has been growing. However, organic farming regulations and philosophies may influence the risk for JD transmission on Ontario organic dairy farms. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate differences in JD ELISA test positive prevalence, risk factors for JD and recommendations for JD prevention between organic and conventional dairy herds in Ontario. RAMP results (i.e. RAMP scores and recommendations) and ELISA results were available for 2103 dairy herds, including 42 organic herds. If available, additional data on milk production, milk quality, and herd characteristics were gathered. Organic and conventional herds had a similar herd-level JD ELISA test-positive prevalence (26.2% and 27.2%, respectively). Organic herds (4.2%) had a higher within-herd JD ELISA test-positive prevalence compared to conventional herds (2.3%) if they had at least one JD test-positive animal on the farm. Organic farms had lower risk scores for biosecurity (9 points lower), and higher scores in the calving (7 points higher) and the calf-rearing management areas (4 points higher). After accounting for RAMP score, organic farms received fewer recommendations for the calving management area (Odds Ratio = 0.41) and more recommendations in the adult cow management area (Odds Ratio = 2.70). A zero-inflated negative binomial model was built with purchase of animals and the herd size included in the logistic portion of the model. Herd type (organic or conventional), colostrum and milk feeding practices, average bulk tank somatic cell count, and presence of non-Holstein breeds were included in the negative binomial portion of the model. Organic farms had a higher number of test positive animals (Count Ratio = 2.02). Further research is necessary to investigate the apparent disconnect between risk factors and recommendations on organic dairy farms.
AB - Johne's disease (JD) is a chronic, infectious disease in cattle. Between 2010 and 2013, a voluntary JD control program was successfully launched in Ontario, Canada, including a Risk Assessment and Management Plan (RAMP) and JD ELISA testing of the entire milking herd. Over the last decade, the organic dairy sector has been growing. However, organic farming regulations and philosophies may influence the risk for JD transmission on Ontario organic dairy farms. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate differences in JD ELISA test positive prevalence, risk factors for JD and recommendations for JD prevention between organic and conventional dairy herds in Ontario. RAMP results (i.e. RAMP scores and recommendations) and ELISA results were available for 2103 dairy herds, including 42 organic herds. If available, additional data on milk production, milk quality, and herd characteristics were gathered. Organic and conventional herds had a similar herd-level JD ELISA test-positive prevalence (26.2% and 27.2%, respectively). Organic herds (4.2%) had a higher within-herd JD ELISA test-positive prevalence compared to conventional herds (2.3%) if they had at least one JD test-positive animal on the farm. Organic farms had lower risk scores for biosecurity (9 points lower), and higher scores in the calving (7 points higher) and the calf-rearing management areas (4 points higher). After accounting for RAMP score, organic farms received fewer recommendations for the calving management area (Odds Ratio = 0.41) and more recommendations in the adult cow management area (Odds Ratio = 2.70). A zero-inflated negative binomial model was built with purchase of animals and the herd size included in the logistic portion of the model. Herd type (organic or conventional), colostrum and milk feeding practices, average bulk tank somatic cell count, and presence of non-Holstein breeds were included in the negative binomial portion of the model. Organic farms had a higher number of test positive animals (Count Ratio = 2.02). Further research is necessary to investigate the apparent disconnect between risk factors and recommendations on organic dairy farms.
KW - Control program
KW - Dairy cow
KW - Organic farming
KW - Paratuberculosis
KW - Risk factor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952639379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952639379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.09.004
DO - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.09.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 26454797
AN - SCOPUS:84952639379
SN - 0167-5877
VL - 122
SP - 83
EP - 91
JO - Preventive Veterinary Medicine
JF - Preventive Veterinary Medicine
IS - 1-2
ER -