Abstract
The performance of adaptive protocols using either aggressiveness control, risk control or both are compared to each other and an optimistic protocol. Empirical results are presented from execution on a CM-5 using up to 256 nodes. The results demonstrate that between the aggressiveness and risk control protocols, the aggressiveness control protocol performs better overall; however, risk control performs best in some situations. A protocol combining aggressiveness and risk control is more consistent at performing better than an optimistic protocol. Also, the use of straggler information is seen to enhance the risk control protocol.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 90-96 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the IEEE Annual Simulation Symposium |
| State | Published - 1996 |
| Event | Proceedings of the 1996 29th Annual Simulation Symposium - New Orleans, LA, USA Duration: Apr 8 1996 → Apr 11 1996 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative study of adaptive risk vs. adaptive aggressiveness control in parallel and distributed simulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS