Comparative growth kinetic study of Newcastle disease virus, infectious bursal disease virus and avian influenza virus in chicken embryo fibroblast and DF-1 cell lines

S. Anam, S. U. Rahman, S. Ali, M. Saeed, S. M. Goyal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Viral diseases have caused devastating effect on poultry industry leading to significant losses in economy of world. In the presented study, the ability of Newcastle disease virus (NDV), infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) and avian influenza virus (AIV) to grow in two cell lines was evaluated. Both chicken embryo fibroblast (CEF) and DF-1 cells were used and cytopathic effects (CPE) produced by these viruses were observed. The titer of virus in terms of TCID50 was determined after 24h up to four days for each virus. The same type of CPE was observed for all viruses used in the study in both DF-1 and CEF cells. IBDV showed CPE causing rounding of cells while NDV caused formation of multicellular large nuclei, cell fusion and rounding of cells. Giant cells with inclusions and aggregation of cells with intact monolayer was observed for AIV. In growth kinetic study, higher titer of IBDV and NDV was observed in CEF cells than DF-1 cells while for AIV, DF-1 cells showed higher titer than CEF cells. These results would be useful for furthers comparative studies on growth of different cell lines of various viruses to find a suitability for vaccine production.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)287-292
Number of pages6
JournalPolish Journal of Veterinary Sciences
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Polish Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Cytopathic effect
  • Growth kinetic
  • Titer
  • Vaccine production

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative growth kinetic study of Newcastle disease virus, infectious bursal disease virus and avian influenza virus in chicken embryo fibroblast and DF-1 cell lines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this