Abstract
Treatment of colorectal cancer is becoming more uniform, with wider acceptance of standardized guidelines. However, areas of controversy exist where the appropriate treatment is not clear, including: : should a segmental colectomy or a more extensive resection be performed in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer? : should an asymptomatic primary cancer be resected in the presence of unresectable metastatic disease? : what is the role of extended lymph node resection in colon and rectal cancer? : are there clinically significant benefits for a robotic approach to colorectal resection versus a laparoscopic approach? This chapter will examine these issues and discuss how they may be resolved.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 143-163 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Cancer treatment and research |
| Volume | 164 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Complete mesocolic excision
- Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer
- Metastatic colon cancer
- Robotic surgery
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative effectiveness in colon and rectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS